The Interaction between Top Management and Line Managers Implementing Strategic Directions into Praxis

Organizations nowadays face crucial business challenges, like globalization, profitability through growth, technology integration, intellectual capital management, continuous change. Seeking to survive in the turbulent environment organizations need to assess the complexity of environment and to choose strategic development directions which are concretized in organizational strategy. Every organization is guided by its strategy, by a design or plan for achieving an organization's policy goals and objectives, however the inequality between intended and implemented strategies exists (Mintzberg, 1978). Acknowledging this fact, the paper raises a question why organizations focus on difficulties by implementing their strategies and provides an insight into the aspects related to a successful implementation of an intended strategy into praxis. The fruitful strategy formulation and the effective strategy implementation require the coordination of multiple actors and their activities (Heide, Gronhaug & Johannessen, 2002). Whereas top management is responsible for the strategic and organizational decisions that affect the organization as a whole (Helfat, Harris & Wolfson, 2006) and line managers operate as an intermediary between strategic and operational organizational activities (McCarthy, Darcy & Grady, 2010), the interaction between these two key actors in order to minimize the gap between strategies is essential. Assuming that some aspects may affect the success of key actors interaction, the assumptions, which determine the nature of interaction are presented. The paper looks into four assumptions: organizational culture, organizational structure, communication and allocation of resources which discloses the complexity of interaction. The paper proposes the discussion concerning the top management and line managers interaction and the key dimensions of that interaction seeking to ensure the implementation of strategic directions into praxis. Whereas top management and line managers can cooperate in a various number of activities, some dimensions of interaction are more significant. Goals determination, strategy formulation and strategy implementation are three key dimensions where interaction between top management and line managers is in demand if the organization strives to translate strategic directions into praxis. Finally assessing the character of activity and the discussed assumptions, the theoretical aspects on interaction between top management and line managers were verified during the empirical research in educational organizations and is presented in this paper. This brings to conclusion that the interaction between top management and line managers implementing strategic directions into praxis should be considered as a central issue of management literature. The paper is based on the material of the Leonardo da Vinci innovation transferring project "Crossnational quality management in continuing learning for people with low educational attainment in the European context" ("Landerubergreifendes Qualitatsmanagement in der Weiterbildung fur Personen mit niedrigem Bildungsstand im Europaischen Kontext") (No 2009-1-PL-LEO05-05039).http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.22.4.716

[1]  Mohammad Shahalizadeh,et al.  Benchmarking of thesis research: a case study , 2009 .

[2]  Solveiga Buožiūtė-Rafanavičienė,et al.  Relation between the Attributes of Executive Successor and Organizational Performance , 2009 .

[3]  T. Wall,et al.  Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management-performance studies , 2007 .

[4]  Juan Antonio Trespalacios Gutiérrez,et al.  Can a good organizational climate compensate for a lack of top management commitment to new product development , 2008 .

[5]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[6]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[7]  Heini Ikävalko,et al.  Implementing strategies successfully , 2002 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[9]  Mariluz Fernández-Alles,et al.  Strategic consensus, top management teams, and innovation performance , 2010 .

[10]  M. Marchington,et al.  'Best practice' human resource management: perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion? , 2000 .

[11]  Kenneth F. Hyde Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research , 2000 .

[12]  Jean Nollet,et al.  About “strategy” and “strategies” in supply management , 2005 .

[13]  R. Morgan,et al.  In pursuit of the “ideal approach” to successful marketing strategy implementation , 2007 .

[14]  Martin Dandira,et al.  Involvement of implementers: missing element in strategy formulation , 2011 .

[15]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change , 2006 .

[16]  Marta Peris-Ortiz,et al.  Changing the strategy formation process in a service cooperative , 2010 .

[17]  Juani Swart,et al.  Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box , 2003 .

[18]  Marjan Sarshar,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach , 2002 .

[19]  Adrian Thornhill,et al.  What if line managers don’t realize they’re responsible for HR? , 1998 .

[20]  Correlates of internal and external leadership of top managementteams , 1995 .

[21]  Graeme Cocks,et al.  Emerging concepts for implementing strategy , 2010 .

[22]  Sanjay Mohapatra,et al.  Understanding IT Strategy , 2012 .

[23]  John F. Sherry,et al.  Creating a Market Orientation: A Longitudinal, Multifirm, Grounded Analysis of Cultural Transformation , 2006 .

[24]  Kjell Grønhaug,et al.  Exploring barriers to the successful implementation of a formulated strategy , 2002 .

[25]  K. Pyhältö,et al.  Strategy process as an innovative learning environment , 2009 .

[26]  C. Hales Moving down the Line? The Shifting Boundary between Middle and First-Line Management , 2006 .

[27]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  Linking top manager attributions to strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnarounds , 2002 .

[28]  Alma McCarthy,et al.  Work-life balance policy and practice: Understanding line manager attitudes and behaviors , 2010 .

[29]  Charles W. L. Hill Gareth R. Jones,et al.  STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[30]  Viara Popova,et al.  Formal modelling of organisational goals based on performance indicators , 2011, Data Knowl. Eng..

[31]  K. Macky,et al.  The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects , 2007 .

[32]  Gintaras Šaparnis,et al.  Imperatives for Enterprise Strategists , 2009 .

[33]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Leadership behaviors, organizational culture and knowledge management practices: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[34]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The Pipeline to the Top: Women and Men in the Top Executive Ranks of U.S. Corporations , 2006 .

[35]  A. Konrad,et al.  Creating a vision boosts the impact of top management support on the employment of managers with disabilities , 2010 .

[36]  R. Harrington The moderating effects of size, manager tactics and involvement on strategy implementation in foodservice , 2006 .

[37]  J. Paauwe HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects , 2009 .

[38]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .