Promoting students’ argument comprehension and evaluation skills: Implementation of two training interventions in higher education

[1]  T. Richter,et al.  Verstehen von Argumenten in wissenschaftlichen Texten , 2020 .

[2]  PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) , 2019, PISA.

[3]  Sebastian Schmid,et al.  The ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts: Measurement, cognitive processes, nomological network, and relevance for academic success at the university , 2019, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  Kirsten Berthold,et al.  How to improve argumentation comprehension in university students: experimental test of a training approach , 2018, Instructional Science.

[5]  Kirsten Berthold,et al.  The use of source-related strategies in evaluating multiple psychology texts: a student–scientist comparison , 2016 .

[6]  Kirsten Berthold,et al.  Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison , 2016 .

[7]  Markus H. Hefter,et al.  Effects of a training intervention to foster precursors of evaluativist epistemological understanding and intellectual values , 2015 .

[8]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information , 2014 .

[9]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Text Belief Consistency Effects in the Comprehension of Multiple Texts With Conflicting Information , 2013 .

[11]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse , 2010, Science.

[12]  A. Renkl,et al.  How to Foster Active Processing of Explanations in Instructional Communication , 2010 .

[13]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials , 2009, Trials.

[14]  Tobias Richter,et al.  You don't have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. A. Britt,et al.  DISFLUENCIES IN COMPREHENDING ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS , 2004 .

[16]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .

[17]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[18]  F. Suppe.  The Structure of a Scientific Paper , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  V. Shaw.  The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning , 1996 .

[20]  Marilyn J. Chambliss,et al.  Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. , 1995 .

[21]  Kathleen M. Galotti,et al.  Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. , 1989 .

[22]  C. Bazerman.  Physicists Reading Physics , 1985 .

[23]  D. Green.  Induction: Representation, Strategy And Argument , 1994 .

[24]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..