School feeding as a social protection programme or a political largesse: a review

Purpose In an attempt to tackle the incidence of poverty and social exclusion in the Ghanaian society, a number of social protection programmes including the school feeding programme is introduced. The programme is designed to cater for the extreme poor and as well encourage enrolment and attendance in the country. The purpose of this paper is to assess the intention or objective for which the programme is initiated and the realities on the ground. It looks at whether the current beneficiaries are the extreme poor described in the policy document. Design/methodology/approach The study explored the incidence of poverty in Ghana using the Ghana Living Standard Survey (GLSS6) and the Ghana School Feeding Annual Operation Plan (GSFAOP) with the help of the school feeding policy document to draw on actual beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries. The differences between percentages of poverty (2012/2013) and feeding schools was computed using GLSS6 and GSFAOP. The study also conducted a number of open-ended interviews with some stakeholders to validate the nature of recruitment of beneficiary schools. Findings The study concluded that there is a mismatch of potential beneficiaries and current beneficiaries using the referred data sources. It was found out that majority of beneficiary schools are located within areas of lesser incidence of poverty. This could be attributed to political interference in view of testimonies from respondents and the computerisation of GLSS6 and GSFAOP. The study therefore proposed that the allocation of feeding schools should be done to reflect the percentage of poverty situation in each region. This could be achieved when the district education office takes control. It will help minimise the level of politicisation and as well improve efficiency. Originality/value The study therefore highlighted the relevance of the school feeding programme and the inverse relationship it has with political interference. It again demonstrates the need to restructure the operations of the programme to meet the objective for which it was established.

[1]  Issah Iddrisu.  Improving school feeding through participation: should the teacher be actively involved? , 2018 .

[2]  Valentin F. Lang,et al.  Defining and Measuring Poverty and Inequality Post‐2015 , 2015 .

[3]  Kristine N. Piescher,et al.  Differences in the early care and education needs of young children involved in child protection , 2014 .

[4]  R. Sonnino,et al.  Reflexive governance for food security: The example of school feeding in Brazil , 2014 .

[5]  R. Kanbur,et al.  Social Protection and Poverty Reduction: Global Patterns and Some Targets , 2014 .

[6]  A. Gelli,et al.  Are School Feeding Programs in Low-Income Settings Sustainable? Insights on the Costs of School Feeding Compared with Investments in Primary Education , 2013, Food and nutrition bulletin.

[7]  H. Nudzor.  Exploring the policy implementation paradox: using the Free Compulsory Universal Basic Education (fCUBE) policy in Ghana as an exemplar , 2013 .

[8]  A. Essuman,et al.  School feeding and educational access in rural Ghana: Is poor targeting and delivery limiting impact? , 2013 .

[9]  Maria Emma Santos,et al.  Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index , 2013 .

[10]  P. McEwan.  The Impact of Chile's School Feeding Program on Education Outcomes. , 2013 .

[11]  M. Barker,et al.  Meeting school food standards – students’ food choice and free school meals , 2013, Public Health Nutrition.

[12]  D. Bundy,et al.  School food, politics and child health , 2012, Public Health Nutrition.

[13]  B. Hedblad,et al.  Scoring models of a diet quality index and the predictive capability of mortality in a population-based cohort of Swedish men and women , 2012, Public Health Nutrition.

[14]  R. Slater.  Cash transfers, social protection and poverty reduction , 2011 .

[15]  J. Sumberg,et al.  Linking agricultural development to school feeding in sub-Saharan Africa: Theoretical perspectives , 2011 .

[16]  R. Holmes.  The role of social protection programmes in supporting education in conflict-affected situations , 2011 .

[17]  P. Saunders.  Down and Out , 2011 .

[18]  Caitlin Milazzo,et al.  When do you follow the (national) leader? Party switching by subnational legislators in Japan , 2011 .

[19]  Lars Kjær,et al.  Feasts and gifts: sharing food in the middle ages , 2011 .

[20]  C. Probart,et al.  School feeding programs in developing countries: impacts on children's health and educational outcomes. , 2011, Nutrition reviews.

[21]  M. Adato,et al.  Social protection to support vulnerable children and families: the potential of cash transfers to protect education, health and nutrition , 2009, AIDS care.

[22]  D. Bundy,et al.  Rethinking School Feeding: Social Safety Nets, Child Development, and the Education Sector , 2009 .

[23]  Paul Glewwe,et al.  The determinants of school attainment in sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Ghana , 1996 .

[24]  J. Servais.  International Labour Organization (ILO) , 2011 .

[25]  O. Uduku,et al.  School Building Design for Feeding Programmes and Community Outreach: Insights from Ghana and South Africa. , 2011 .

[26]  Q. Wodon,et al.  Social protection , 2010 .

[27]  A. Gelli,et al.  School Feeding, seasonality and schooling outcomes: a case study from Malawi , 2009 .

[28]  J. Harrison.  Current Legal Developments - International Labour Organization , 2008 .