ExEP yield modeling tool and validation test results

EXOSIMS is an open-source simulation tool for parametric modeling of the detection yield and characterization of exoplanets. EXOSIMS has been adopted by the Exoplanet Exploration Programs Standards Definition and Evaluation Team (ExSDET) as a common mechanism for comparison of exoplanet mission concept studies. To ensure trustworthiness of the tool, we developed a validation test plan that leverages the Python-language unit-test framework, utilizes integration tests for selected module interactions, and performs end-to-end crossvalidation with other yield tools. This paper presents the test methods and results, with the physics-based tests such as photometry and integration time calculation treated in detail and the functional tests treated summarily. The test case utilized a 4m unobscured telescope with an idealized coronagraph and an exoplanet population from the IPAC radial velocity (RV) exoplanet catalog. The known RV planets were set at quadrature to allow deterministic validation of the calculation of physical parameters, such as working angle, photon counts and integration time. The observing keepout region was tested by generating plots and movies of the targets and the keepout zone over a year. Although the keepout integration test required the interpretation of a user, the test revealed problems in the L2 halo orbit and the parameterization of keepout applied to some solar system bodies, which the development team was able to address. The validation testing of EXOSIMS was performed iteratively with the developers of EXOSIMS and resulted in a more robust, stable, and trustworthy tool that the exoplanet community can use to simulate exoplanet direct-detection missions from probe class, to WFIRST, up to large mission concepts such as HabEx and LUVOIR.

[1]  Aki Roberge,et al.  MAXIMIZING THE ExoEarth CANDIDATE YIELD FROM A FUTURE DIRECT IMAGING MISSION , 2014, 1409.5128.

[2]  Stuart Bowyer,et al.  The 1997 reference of diffuse night sky brightness , 1998 .

[3]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  WFIRST-AFTA coronagraph science yield modeling with EXOSIMS , 2015, 1511.02869.

[4]  M. McElwain,et al.  LOWER LIMITS ON APERTURE SIZE FOR AN EXOEARTH DETECTING CORONAGRAPHIC MISSION , 2015, 1506.01723.

[5]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  Science Yield Modeling with EXOSIMS , 2016 .

[6]  Bijan Nemati Detector selection for the WFIRST-AFTA coronagraph integral field spectrograph , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[7]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  Science yield modeling with the Exoplanet Open-Source Imaging Mission Simulator (EXOSIMS) , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Mark S. Marley,et al.  Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magnitude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits , 2006 .

[9]  K. Cahoy,et al.  EXOPLANET ALBEDO SPECTRA AND COLORS AS A FUNCTION OF PLANET PHASE, SEPARATION, AND METALLICITY , 2010, 1009.3071.

[10]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  EXOSIMS: Exoplanet Open-Source Imaging Mission Simulator , 2017 .

[11]  Rachel L. Akeson,et al.  The NASA Exoplanet Archive , 2015 .

[12]  Mark S. Marley,et al.  Erratum: ``Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magnitude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits'' ( ApJ, 659, 1661 [2007] ) , 2007 .

[13]  Olivier Guyon,et al.  Science yield estimate with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope coronagraph , 2016 .