Identification of domains from protein sequences.

[1]  S. Karlin,et al.  Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  W. Pearson.  Searching protein sequence libraries: comparison of the sensitivity and selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and FASTA algorithms. , 1991, Genomics.

[3]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  S. Eddy.  Hidden Markov models. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  E V Koonin,et al.  A duplicated catalytic motif in a new superfamily of phosphohydrolases and phospholipid synthases that includes poxvirus envelope proteins. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  M. Gribskov,et al.  [13] Identification of sequence patterns with profile analysis , 1996 .

[7]  R. Doolittle.  The multiplicity of domains in proteins. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[8]  S. Altschul,et al.  Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Lupas.  Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  W R Pearson,et al.  Dynamic programming algorithms for biological sequence comparison. , 1992, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  S A Benner,et al.  Amino acid substitution during functionally constrained divergent evolution of protein sequences. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[12]  D. Haussler,et al.  Hidden Markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  W. Fitch.  Uses for evolutionary trees. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  S F Altschul,et al.  Local alignment statistics. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  T. Gibson,et al.  Applying motif and profile searches. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  S. Altschul,et al.  Issues in searching molecular sequence databases , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[18]  D. Lipman,et al.  Extracting protein alignment models from the sequence database. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  C. Chothia,et al.  Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Wootton,et al.  Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[21]  G. Schneider,et al.  Circular permutations of natural protein sequences: structural evidence. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[22]  C P Ponting,et al.  A novel family of phospholipase D homologues that includes phospholipid synthases and putative endonucleases: Identification of duplicated repeats and potential active site residues , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  T J Gibson,et al.  PairWise and SearchWise: finding the optimal alignment in a simultaneous comparison of a protein profile against all DNA translation frames. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  P. Bucher,et al.  A conserved domain is present in different families of vesicular fusion proteins: a new superfamily. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.