The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis

Mammography is currently the standard breast cancer screening procedure, even though it is constrained by low specificity in the detection of malignancy and low sensitivity in women with dense breast tissue. Modern imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been developed in an effort to replace or complement mammography, because the early detection of breast cancer is critical for efficient treatment and long-term survival of patients. Nuclear medicine imaging technology has been introduced in the field of oncology with the development of positron emission tomography (PET), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and, ultimately, positron emission mammography (PEM). PET offers the advantage of precise diagnosis, by measuring metabolism with the use of a radiotracer and identifying changes at the cellular level. PET/CT imaging allows for a more accurate assessment by merging the anatomic localization to the functional image. However, both techniques have not yet been established as diagnostic tools in early breast cancer detection, primarily because of low sensitivity, especially for sub-centimeter and low-grade tumors. PEM, a breast-specific device with increased spatial resolution, has been developed in order to overcome these limitations. It has demonstrated higher detectability than PET/CT and comparable or better sensitivity than MRI. The ability to target the lesions visible in PEM with PEM-guided breast biopsy systems adds to its usability in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. The results from recent studies summarized in this review indicate that PEM may prove to be a useful first-line diagnostic tool, although further evaluation and improvement are required.

[1]  P. Neven,et al.  Additional Value of PET–CT in Staging of Clinical Stage IIB and III Breast Cancer , 2010, The breast journal.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .

[3]  T. King,et al.  Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010 .

[4]  A. Kjær,et al.  Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  A. Michell,et al.  MP44-04 IMPORTANCE OF THE ULTRASOUND CHARACTERISTICS OF REGIONS OF INTEREST BY MRI AND THE ADDITIONAL TARGET BIOPSY AROUND THEIR PERI-HYPOECHOIC LESIONS IN MR/TRUS SOFTWARE FUSION BIOPSY TO IMPROVE DETECTION RATE OF PROSTATE CANCER , 2023, Journal of Urology.

[6]  I D Wilkinson,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  N. Fujiuchi,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography optimizes neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer to achieve pathological complete response , 2012 .

[8]  J. Mulshine,et al.  Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. , 2007, JAMA.

[10]  T. Tsuchida,et al.  Role of PET/CT in Gynecological Tumors Based on the Revised FIGO Staging Classification , 2011, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[11]  H. Degani,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor vasculature , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[12]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[14]  J. Filmont,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[15]  K. Kang,et al.  The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[16]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[17]  S. Acuna,et al.  Impact of Preoperative Breast MRIs on Timing of Surgery and Type of Intervention in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  P. Ruggieri,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its association with gadolinium exposure during MRI. , 2008, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[19]  C J Thompson,et al.  Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  S. Majewski,et al.  Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[22]  W. Yang,et al.  Advances in imaging of inflammatory breast cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[23]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Johnston,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a large retrospective study from the Royal Marsden Hospital. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  Mohan Doss,et al.  Positron Emission Mammography: Initial Clinical Results , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  D. Mankoff Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, et al (Univ of Sheffield, UK) Eur J Surg Oncol 37:187-198, 2011 § , 2011 .

[28]  Robert Livingston,et al.  Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Yun Yen,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[30]  A. Aravkin,et al.  Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  E. Ozkan,et al.  The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.

[32]  L. Adler,et al.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging for primary breast cancer and loco-regional staging. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[33]  R. Aft,et al.  The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision‐making: Are patients at risk for mastectomy? , 2009, Journal of surgical oncology.

[34]  I. Weinberg Applications for positron emission mammography. , 2006, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[35]  Jared A. Christensen,et al.  Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  Jeffrey D Blume,et al.  Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. , 2010, Radiology.

[37]  W. Yang 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) Imaging in the Staging and Prognosis of Inflammatory Breast Cancer , 2010 .

[38]  S. Vallabhajosula,et al.  A broad overview of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals and clinical applications: what is new? , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[39]  P. Lewis,et al.  Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[41]  M. J. Vendrell Outcome of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy , 2009 .

[42]  J. Talbot,et al.  [18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[43]  W. Han,et al.  Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. , 2012, Breast.

[44]  A Heinig,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[45]  Les Irwig,et al.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[47]  F. Shellock,et al.  MRI safety update 2008: part 1, MRI contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  C J Thompson,et al.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[49]  金子 文成,et al.  長時間歩行時の下肢筋の活動状態:[ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucoseを用いたPositron Emission Tomographyによる検討 , 2008 .

[50]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2003, Radiology.

[51]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  P. Mikosch,et al.  Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. , 2003, Breast.

[54]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Breast cancer statistics, 2011 , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[55]  Renee M Moadel,et al.  Breast cancer imaging devices. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[56]  W. Woodward,et al.  Pretreatment staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with inflammatory breast cancer influences radiation treatment field designs. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[57]  Ora Israel,et al.  The role of FDG‐PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer , 2006, Cancer.

[58]  C. Meltzer,et al.  PET/CT: form and function. , 2007, Radiology.

[59]  W. Han,et al.  Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[60]  H. Krontiras,et al.  Image‐guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions , 2011, Journal of surgical oncology.

[61]  M. Morrow,et al.  Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[62]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. , 1993, Radiology.

[64]  Janet Waters,et al.  MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment , 2011, The Lancet.

[65]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[66]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[67]  Mathias K. Fehr,et al.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET , 2003, European Radiology.

[68]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  PET‐Guided Breast Biopsy , 2011, The breast journal.

[69]  Lorraine Tafra Positron emission mammography: A new breast imaging device , 2008, Journal of surgical oncology.

[70]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[71]  Jacqueline R. Halladay,et al.  Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[72]  Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[73]  D. Narayanan,et al.  Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. , 2011, Radiology.

[74]  Ludovic Ferrer,et al.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  L. Galuska,et al.  The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[76]  Jason S. Lewis,et al.  The next generation of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals in oncology. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[77]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[78]  A. Elster,et al.  Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2009 .