The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dimitra Koulocheri | V. Kalles | G. Zografos | Vasileios Kalles | George C Zografos | Xeni Provatopoulou | Antonia Gounaris | X. Provatopoulou | A. Gounaris | D. Koulocheri
[1] P. Neven,et al. Additional Value of PET–CT in Staging of Clinical Stage IIB and III Breast Cancer , 2010, The breast journal.
[2] A. Jemal,et al. Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .
[3] T. King,et al. Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010 .
[4] A. Kjær,et al. Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[5] A. Michell,et al. MP44-04 IMPORTANCE OF THE ULTRASOUND CHARACTERISTICS OF REGIONS OF INTEREST BY MRI AND THE ADDITIONAL TARGET BIOPSY AROUND THEIR PERI-HYPOECHOIC LESIONS IN MR/TRUS SOFTWARE FUSION BIOPSY TO IMPROVE DETECTION RATE OF PROSTATE CANCER , 2023, Journal of Urology.
[6] I D Wilkinson,et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[7] N. Fujiuchi,et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography optimizes neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer to achieve pathological complete response , 2012 .
[8] J. Mulshine,et al. Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[9] P. Grigsby,et al. Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. , 2007, JAMA.
[10] T. Tsuchida,et al. Role of PET/CT in Gynecological Tumors Based on the Revised FIGO Staging Classification , 2011, Clinical nuclear medicine.
[11] H. Degani,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor vasculature , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
[12] Elizabeth A Morris,et al. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[13] Deepa Narayanan,et al. High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.
[14] J. Filmont,et al. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice. , 2009, European journal of radiology.
[15] K. Kang,et al. The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography , 2011, Acta radiologica.
[16] Thomas Beyer,et al. PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[17] S. Acuna,et al. Impact of Preoperative Breast MRIs on Timing of Surgery and Type of Intervention in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[18] P. Ruggieri,et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its association with gadolinium exposure during MRI. , 2008, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.
[19] C J Thompson,et al. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[20] S. Majewski,et al. Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[21] Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al. A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. , 2010, Health technology assessment.
[22] W. Yang,et al. Advances in imaging of inflammatory breast cancer , 2010, Cancer.
[23] Harry J de Koning,et al. BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] M Schwaiger,et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[25] S. Johnston,et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a large retrospective study from the Royal Marsden Hospital. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[26] Mohan Doss,et al. Positron Emission Mammography: Initial Clinical Results , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[27] D. Mankoff. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, et al (Univ of Sheffield, UK) Eur J Surg Oncol 37:187-198, 2011 § , 2011 .
[28] Robert Livingston,et al. Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[29] Yun Yen,et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[30] A. Aravkin,et al. Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[31] E. Ozkan,et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.
[32] L. Adler,et al. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging for primary breast cancer and loco-regional staging. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[33] R. Aft,et al. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision‐making: Are patients at risk for mastectomy? , 2009, Journal of surgical oncology.
[34] I. Weinberg. Applications for positron emission mammography. , 2006, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[35] Jared A. Christensen,et al. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[36] Jeffrey D Blume,et al. Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. , 2010, Radiology.
[37] W. Yang. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) Imaging in the Staging and Prognosis of Inflammatory Breast Cancer , 2010 .
[38] S. Vallabhajosula,et al. A broad overview of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals and clinical applications: what is new? , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[39] P. Lewis,et al. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[40] Deepa Narayanan,et al. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[41] M. J. Vendrell. Outcome of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy , 2009 .
[42] J. Talbot,et al. [18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[43] W. Han,et al. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. , 2012, Breast.
[44] A Heinig,et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.
[45] Les Irwig,et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[46] Mary Scott Soo,et al. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.
[47] F. Shellock,et al. MRI safety update 2008: part 1, MRI contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[48] C J Thompson,et al. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.
[49] 金子 文成,et al. 長時間歩行時の下肢筋の活動状態:[ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucoseを用いたPositron Emission Tomographyによる検討 , 2008 .
[50] Mitchell D Schnall,et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2003, Radiology.
[51] Etta D Pisano,et al. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[52] M. Schwaiger,et al. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[53] P. Mikosch,et al. Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. , 2003, Breast.
[54] Ahmedin Jemal,et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2011 , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[55] Renee M Moadel,et al. Breast cancer imaging devices. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[56] W. Woodward,et al. Pretreatment staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with inflammatory breast cancer influences radiation treatment field designs. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[57] Ora Israel,et al. The role of FDG‐PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer , 2006, Cancer.
[58] C. Meltzer,et al. PET/CT: form and function. , 2007, Radiology.
[59] W. Han,et al. Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, BMC Cancer.
[60] H. Krontiras,et al. Image‐guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions , 2011, Journal of surgical oncology.
[61] M. Morrow,et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[62] Michael E Phelps,et al. Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[63] R. Hendrick,et al. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. , 1993, Radiology.
[64] Janet Waters,et al. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment , 2011, The Lancet.
[65] Elizabeth A Morris,et al. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[66] C. Gatsonis,et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[67] Mathias K. Fehr,et al. Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET , 2003, European Radiology.
[68] Deepa Narayanan,et al. PET‐Guided Breast Biopsy , 2011, The breast journal.
[69] Lorraine Tafra. Positron emission mammography: A new breast imaging device , 2008, Journal of surgical oncology.
[70] Mitchell D Schnall,et al. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[71] Jacqueline R. Halladay,et al. Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[72] Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. , 2005, American journal of surgery.
[73] D. Narayanan,et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. , 2011, Radiology.
[74] Ludovic Ferrer,et al. Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[75] L. Galuska,et al. The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[76] Jason S. Lewis,et al. The next generation of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals in oncology. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[77] Paul Kinahan,et al. Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[78] A. Elster,et al. Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2009 .