Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness

Abstract The present study compares the relative effects of cognitive style and training method on learners' computer self-efficacy and learning performance by a field experiment. The purpose was to determine which training method could be best utilized in computer-related training while taking trainees' cognitive style into account. The significant two- and three-way interactions indicate the critical roles that personal characteristics and situation factors play as joint determinants of behavior. Gender did significantly moderate the effects of training method on performance and self-efficacy. The cognitive by training method effects were most significant for female participants. This finding suggests that to assist individuals taking IT-related training courses, the contingency effects of gender, cognitive style, training approach, and training objective should be taken into account.

[1]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[2]  C. Tinajero,et al.  Field Dependence/Independence and Performance in School: An Argument against Neutrality of Cognitive Style , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[4]  C. Tinajero,et al.  Field dependence‐independence and academic achievement: a re‐examination of their relationship , 1997 .

[5]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  R. Snow,et al.  Instructional psychology: aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  W. M. Reed,et al.  The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment , 1994 .

[8]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[9]  P. MacIntyre,et al.  Motivational Influences on Computer-Related Affective States. , 1999 .

[10]  Maria Helena Novaes,et al.  Cognition: Theory, Research, Promise , 1965 .

[11]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  The Relationship of Information System Training Methods and Cognitive Ability to End-User Satisfaction, Comprehension, and Skill Transfer: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[13]  Steven John Simon.  The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end user satisfaction, comprehension and skill transfer: a field experiment , 1994 .

[14]  CompeauDeborah,et al.  Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology , 1999 .

[15]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Conceptual Versus Procedural Software Training for Graphical User Interfaces: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1994, MIS Q..

[16]  F. Morgan Simpson,et al.  An analysis of the relationship between cognitive styles & grades: New perspectives on success or failure of preservice education majors. , 1992 .

[17]  Richard T. Christoph,et al.  Overcoming barriers to training utilizing technology: The influence of self‐efficacy factors on multimedia‐based training receptiveness , 1998 .

[18]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[19]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Facilitating the implementation of customer‐based inter‐organizational systems: an empirical analysis of innovation and support factors , 1994, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[22]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  Sally A. Lipsky.  Effect of Field Independence/Dependence on Two Textbook Notetaking Techniques. , 1989 .

[24]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  Effects of Learning Style and Training Method on Computer Attitude and Performance in World Wide Web Page Design Training , 1999 .

[25]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Turning Work into Play: Implications for Microcomputer Software Training , 1993 .

[26]  Gerald Halpin,et al.  Effects of Learning Style Accommodation on Achievement of Second Graders. , 1996 .

[27]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[28]  OlfmanLorne,et al.  Conceptual versus procedural software training for graphical user interfaces , 1994 .

[29]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches : A field experiment , 1996 .

[31]  R. Snow,et al.  Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[32]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[34]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[35]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..