Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data

Objective To assess how initial severity of depression affects the benefit derived from low intensity interventions for depression. Design Meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 datasets comparing low intensity interventions with usual care. Setting Primary care and community settings. Participants 2470 patients with depression. Interventions Low intensity interventions for depression (such as guided self help by means of written materials and limited professional support, and internet delivered interventions). Main outcome measures Depression outcomes (measured with the Beck Depression Inventory or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), and the effect of initial depression severity on the effects of low intensity interventions. Results Although patients were referred for low intensity interventions, many had moderate to severe depression at baseline. We found a significant interaction between baseline severity and treatment effect (coefficient −0.1 (95% CI −0.19 to −0.002)), suggesting that patients who are more severely depressed at baseline demonstrate larger treatment effects than those who are less severely depressed. However, the magnitude of the interaction (equivalent to an additional drop of around one point on the Beck Depression Inventory for a one standard deviation increase in initial severity) was small and may not be clinically significant. Conclusions The data suggest that patients with more severe depression at baseline show at least as much clinical benefit from low intensity interventions as less severely depressed patients and could usefully be offered these interventions as part of a stepped care model.

[1]  D Zeng,et al.  Equity-specific effects of interventions to promote physical activity among middle-aged and older adults: results from applying a novel equity-specific re-analysis strategy , 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[2]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  A Short Guide and a Forest Plot Command (Ipdforest) for One-Stage Meta-Analysis , 2012 .

[3]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Martin Utley,et al.  Delivering stepped care: an analysis of implementation in routine practice , 2012, Implementation Science.

[5]  A. Sutton,et al.  Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes , 2012, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  N. Mays,et al.  Evaluating Labour'S Market Reforms, 2002-10 , 2012, Journal of health services research & policy.

[8]  黄亚明(整理),et al.  ICMJE , 2012 .

[9]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The influence of study characteristics on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: systematic review , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  P. Bower,et al.  ' s response to reviews Title : Delivering stepped care for depression : an analysis of implementation in routine practice , 2011 .

[12]  Derek B. Kosty,et al.  A computer-assisted depression intervention in primary care , 2010, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  Michelle G. Craske,et al.  Computer Therapy for the Anxiety and Depressive Disorders Is Effective, Acceptable and Practical Health Care: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  Pim Cuijpers,et al.  Does pretreatment severity moderate the efficacy of psychological treatment of adult outpatient depression? A meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  A. Vickers,et al.  Individual patient data meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic pain: protocol of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration , 2010, Trials.

[16]  Gavin Andrews,et al.  Internet Treatment for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician Assistance , 2010, PloS one.

[17]  Kathleen M Griffiths,et al.  Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. , 2010 .

[18]  Per Carlbring,et al.  Internet administered guided self-help versus individualized e-mail therapy: A randomized trial of two versions of CBT for major depression. , 2010, Behaviour research and therapy.

[19]  J Li,et al.  Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies , 2010, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  R. Riley,et al.  Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  P. Farrand,et al.  Low intensity CBT interventions: A revolution in mental health care. , 2010 .

[22]  G. Andersson,et al.  Internet-Based and Other Computerized Psychological Treatments for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Cognitive behaviour therapy.

[23]  Richard Layard,et al.  Improving access to psychological therapy: Initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites , 2009, Behaviour research and therapy.

[24]  S. Crow,et al.  Stepped Care Treatment of Postpartum Depression: Impact on Treatment, Health, and Work Outcomes , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[25]  H. Riper,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of online computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial , 2009, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[26]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Stepped care for depression and anxiety: from primary care to specialized mental health care: a randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a stepped care program among primary care patients with mood or anxiety disorders , 2009, BMC health services research.

[27]  C. Beevers,et al.  Effectiveness of a Novel Integrative Online Treatment for Depression (Deprexis): Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  Anna Velander Gisslén,et al.  Reference List , 2006, Mammalian Genome.

[29]  Yi-Hwei Li,et al.  Exploring the Efficacy of Cognitive Bibliotherapy and a Potential Mechanism of Change in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms Among the Chinese: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[30]  P. Bower,et al.  Developing guided self-help for depression using the Medical Research Council complex interventions framework: a description of the modelling phase and results of an exploratory randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMC psychiatry.

[31]  Heleen Riper,et al.  Internet-Based Treatment for Adults with Depressive Symptoms: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[32]  Chris Salisbury,et al.  Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  Pim Cuijpers,et al.  Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Intervention for Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[34]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  F. Deane,et al.  Effectiveness of bibliotherapy self-help for depression with varying levels of telephone helpline support. , 2008, Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.

[36]  A J Sutton,et al.  Meta‐analysis of individual‐ and aggregate‐level data , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  J. Hilden,et al.  Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  M C Simmonds,et al.  Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  Heleen Riper,et al.  Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression in people over 50 years old: a randomized controlled clinical trial , 2007, Psychological Medicine.

[40]  Karina Lovell,et al.  What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression , 2007, Psychological Medicine.

[41]  Heleen Riper,et al.  Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis , 2006, Psychological Medicine.

[42]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[43]  W. Stiles,et al.  Transforming between Beck Depression Inventory and CORE-OM scores in routine clinical practice. , 2006, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[44]  A. van Straten,et al.  Stepped care vs. matched care for mood and anxiety disorders: a randomized trial in routine practice , 2006, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[45]  M Greaves,et al.  Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[46]  K R Abrams,et al.  Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[47]  P. Salkovskis,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of the use of self-help materials in addition to standard general practice treatment of depression compared to standard treatment alone , 2005, Psychological Medicine.

[48]  G. Andersson,et al.  Internet-based self-help for depression: randomised controlled trial , 2005, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[49]  P. Bower,et al.  The clinical effectiveness of guided self-help versus waiting-list control in the management of anxiety and depression: a randomized controlled trial , 2005, Psychological Medicine.

[50]  R. Araya,et al.  Self-help books for depression: how can practitioners and patients make the right choice? , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[51]  P. Bower,et al.  Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[52]  Simon Gilbody,et al.  Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency , 2005, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[53]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[54]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Minimal-contact psychotherapy for sub-threshold depression in primary care , 2004, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[55]  B. Everitt,et al.  Clinical efficacy of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: Randomised controlled trial , 2004, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[56]  Sara T Brookes,et al.  Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[57]  H. Christensen,et al.  Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Minimal-contact psychotherapy for subthreshold depression in primary care Randomised trial , 2004 .

[59]  M. Barkham,et al.  PHASE: a randomised, controlled trial of supervised self-help cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[60]  C. Coffey,et al.  Modern statistical methods for handling missing repeated measurements in obesity trial data: beyond LOCF , 2003, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[61]  P. Bower,et al.  Meta-analysis of data on costs from trials of counselling in primary care: using individual patient data to overcome sample size limitations in economic analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[62]  J Chilcott,et al.  A systematic review and economic evaluation of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[63]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[64]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[65]  M. Barkham,et al.  Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM , 2002, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[66]  H. Hearnshaw,et al.  A study of the methods used to select review criteria for clinical audit. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[67]  S. Wessely,et al.  A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[68]  P. Bower,et al.  The clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-help treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[69]  G. Davison Stepped care: doing more with less? , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[70]  David E. Booth,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 2000, Technometrics.

[71]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[72]  Igor Sartori,et al.  Empirical Evidence of Bias. Dimensions of Methodological Quality Associated with Estimates of Treatment Effects in Controlled Trials , 1996 .

[73]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[74]  L. Stewart,et al.  Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[75]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[76]  M. Parmar,et al.  Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? , 1993, The Lancet.

[77]  C D Naylor,et al.  Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. , 1989, The Journal of rheumatology.

[78]  A. Beck,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation , 1988 .

[79]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .