Land-use and land-cover change in Atlantic Forest landscapes

The Atlantic Forest is one of the most threatened tropical biomes, with much of the standing forest in small (less than 50 ha), disturbed and isolated patches. The pattern of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) which has resulted in this critical scenario has not yet been fully investigated. Here, we describe the LULCC in three Atlantic Forest fragmented landscapes (Sao Paulo, Brazil) between 1960–1980s and 1980–2000s. The three studied landscapes differ in the current proportion of forest cover, having 10%, 30% and 50% respectively. Between the 1960s and 1980s, forest cover of two landscapes was reduced while the forest cover in the third landscape increased slightly. The opposite trend was observed between the 1980s and 2000s; forest regeneration was greater than deforestation at the landscapes with 10% and 50% of forest cover and, as a consequence, forest cover increased. By contrast, the percentage of forest cover at the landscape with 30% of forest cover was drastically reduced between the 1980s and 2000s. LULCC deviated from a random trajectory, were not constant through time in two study landscapes and were not constant across space in a given time period. This landscape dynamism in single locations over small temporal scales is a key factor to be considered in models of LULCC to accurately simulate future changes for the Atlantic Forest. In general, forest patches became more isolated when deforestation was greater than forest regeneration and became more connected when forest regeneration was greater than deforestation. As a result of the dynamic experienced by the study landscapes, individual forest patches currently consist of a mosaic of different forest age classes which is likely to impact biodiversity. Furthermore, landscape dynamics suggests the beginning of a forest transition in some Atlantic Forest regions, what could be of great importance for biodiversity conservation due to the potential effects of young secondary forests in reducing forest isolation and maintaining a significant amount of the original biodiversity.

[1]  A. Lugo,et al.  Tropical secondary forests , 1990, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[2]  Dengsheng Lu,et al.  Mapping and monitoring land degradation risks in the Western Brazilian Amazon using multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM+ images , 2007 .

[3]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[4]  A. Mather,et al.  The forest transition: a theoretical basis , 1998 .

[5]  J. Metzger,et al.  Beyond the Fragmentation Threshold Hypothesis: Regime Shifts in Biodiversity Across Fragmented Landscapes , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: Lessons from aging human-modified landscapes , 2010 .

[7]  W. Laurance.  When bigger is better: the need for Amazonian mega-reserves. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  R. Didham,et al.  Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[9]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[10]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region , 2009 .

[11]  Ary,et al.  Patterns of Floristic Differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the Influence of Climate 1 , 2000 .

[12]  R. G. Pontius,et al.  Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence , 2004 .

[13]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[14]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: Implications for conservation , 2008 .

[15]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Isolation determines patterns of species presence in highly fragmented landscapes , 2011 .

[16]  J. Metzger,et al.  Edge effects as the principal cause of area effects on birds in fragmented secondary forest , 2010 .

[17]  D. Theobald,et al.  Using indicators of deforestation and land-use dynamics to support conservation strategies: a case study of central Rondônia, Brazil. , 2009 .

[18]  A. Balmford,et al.  Atlantic forest extinctions , 1996, Nature.

[19]  Karen D. Holl,et al.  When and where to actively restore ecosystems , 2011 .

[20]  J. Barlow,et al.  The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for Amazonian birds. , 2007 .

[21]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Modeling landscape dynamics in an Atlantic Rainforest region: Implications for conservation , 2009 .

[22]  David Pullar,et al.  Modeling the age of tropical moist forest fragments in heavily-cleared lowland landscapes of Colombia , 2005 .

[23]  J. Denslow,et al.  Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: implications for wildlife , 2003 .

[24]  W. Laurance,et al.  Temporal fluctuations in Amazonian deforestation rates , 2008, Environmental Conservation.

[25]  W. Laurance,et al.  Scale-dependent patterns of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[26]  Adrian C. Newton,et al.  Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean Temperate Forests , 2006 .

[27]  R. Didham,et al.  The Effect of Fragment Shape and Species' Sensitivity to Habitat Edges on Animal Population Size , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  Marla Perez-Lugo,et al.  When Fields Revert to Forest: Development and Spontaneous Reforestation in Post-War Puerto Rico , 2000 .

[29]  George R. Parker,et al.  Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Leslie Ries,et al.  Ecological Responses to Habitat Edges: Mechanisms, Models, and Variability Explained , 2004 .

[31]  J. Habel,et al.  Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas , 2011 .

[32]  Jurandyr Luciano Sanches Ross,et al.  MAPA GEOMORFOLÓGICO DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO , 1996 .

[33]  S. Jackson,et al.  Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  Manuel R. Guariguata,et al.  Neotropical secondary forest succession : changes in structural and functional characteristics , 2001 .

[35]  T. Rudel,et al.  A Tropical Forest Transition? Agricultural Change, Out-migration, and Secondary Forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon , 2002 .

[36]  Ilse Storch,et al.  Predictors of forest fragmentation sensitivity in Neotropical vertebrates: a quantitative review , 2011 .

[37]  F. Becker,et al.  Land cover and conservation state of a region in the southern limit of the Atlantic forest (river Maquiné basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). , 2004, Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia.

[38]  C. Peres,et al.  Deforestation dynamics in a fragmented region of southern Amazonia: evaluation and future scenarios , 2008, Environmental Conservation.

[39]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change , 2010 .

[40]  Ane Alencar,et al.  Simulating the response of land‐cover changes to road paving and governance along a major Amazon highway: the Santarém–Cuiabá corridor , 2004 .

[41]  J. Metzger,et al.  Relief influence on the spatial distribution of the Atlantic Forest cover on the Ibiúna Plateau, SP. , 2007, Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia.

[42]  T. Brooks,et al.  Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions , 2000 .

[43]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation , 2009 .

[44]  J. Barlow,et al.  Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[45]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[46]  T. Brooks,et al.  Deforestation and bird extinctions in the Atlantic forest , 1999 .

[47]  J. Barlow,et al.  Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Ary T. Oliveira-Filho,et al.  Patterns of Floristic Differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the Influence of Climate1 , 2000 .

[49]  A. Braimoh.  Random and systematic land-cover transitions in northern Ghana , 2006 .

[50]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Corridors Increase Plant Species Richness at Large Scales , 2006, Science.

[51]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[52]  Brian G. Wolff,et al.  Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change , 2001, Science.

[53]  M. Fortin,et al.  The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: A Shrinking Biodiversity Hotspot , 2011 .

[54]  T. Rudel,et al.  A re-emerging Atlantic forest? Urbanization, industrialization and the forest transition in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[55]  A. Mather,et al.  The course and drivers of the forest transition: The case of France , 1999 .

[56]  Stephen G. Perz,et al.  Secondary forest expansion in the Brazilian Amazon and the refinement of forest transition theory , 2003 .

[57]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin , 2006, Nature.

[58]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity , 2011, Nature.

[59]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central Rondônia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios , 2005 .