Assessment of perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using a deconvolution approach based on regression and singular value decomposition

The assessment of tissue perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging involves a deconvolution process. For analysis of DCE imaging data, we implemented a regression approach to select appropriate regularization parameters for deconvolution using the standard and generalized singular value decomposition methods. Monte Carlo simulation experiments were carried out to study the performance and to compare with other existing methods used for deconvolution analysis of DCE imaging data. The present approach is found to be robust and reliable at the levels of noise commonly encountered in DCE imaging, and for different models of the underlying tissue vasculature. The advantages of the present method, as compared with previous methods, include its efficiency of computation, ability to achieve adequate regularization to reproduce less noisy solutions, and that it does not require prior knowledge of the noise condition. The proposed method is applied on actual patient study cases with brain tumors and ischemic stroke, to illustrate its applicability as a clinical tool for diagnosis and assessment of treatment response.

[1]  F. Ståhlberg,et al.  Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  B R Rosen,et al.  Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean tissue transit time. , 1999, Radiology.

[3]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  Perfusion Mapping Using Computed Tomography Allows Accurate Prediction of Cerebral Infarction in Experimental Brain Ischemia , 2001, Stroke.

[4]  E Klotz,et al.  Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT for the quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[5]  T S Koh,et al.  The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Truncated Singular Value Decomposition Solutions to Discrete Ill-Posed Problems with Ill-Determined Numerical Rank , 1990, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  G Brix,et al.  Tumor microcirculation evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. , 2001, Cancer research.

[8]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  G Brix,et al.  Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: Blood‐tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  Practical injection-rate CT perfusion imaging: deconvolution-derived hemodynamics in a case of stroke , 2001, Neuroradiology.

[12]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  HansenPer Christian The truncated SVD as a method for regularization , 1987 .

[14]  W T Yuh,et al.  MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: Correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  T S Koh,et al.  A numerical method for estimating blood flow by dynamic functional imaging. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Matthias Koenig,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of the Ischemic Brain by Means of Perfusion-Related Parameters Derived From Perfusion CT , 2001, Stroke.

[17]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  REGULARIZATION TOOLS: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems , 1994, Numerical Algorithms.

[18]  D. Gadian,et al.  Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Simulations using singular value decomposition , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  R. Wurm,et al.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas , 2001, European Radiology.

[20]  Jianfeng Gao,et al.  Cerebral blood flow measurement by dynamic contrast MRI using singular value decomposition with an adaptive threshold , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Peter R. Johnston,et al.  Selecting the corner in the L-curve approach to Tikhonov regularization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  M. Shinohara,et al.  Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  K. Zierler Equations for Measuring Blood Flow by External Monitoring of Radioisotopes , 1965, Circulation research.

[24]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  A Heerschap,et al.  Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  K. Zierler,et al.  On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. , 1954, Journal of applied physiology.