Effects of context on judgements of odor intensities in humans.

This study evaluated whether the intensity of previously smelled odors could unintentionally influence the subsequent judgement of odor intensity. The predicted context effect was based on the adaptation-level theory. Before and 25 min after either WEAK or STRONG biasing odor concentrations, 51 subjects were required to rate the intensity of 10 different odor concentrations of California Orange Oil. After the WEAK bias, subjects judged the odor intensity as being stronger than they did after the STRONG bias. Thus the intensity of odors smelled 25 min earlier can unintentionally influence subsequent odor intensity judgement. The findings are discussed in the light of two alternative explanations, namely, a central implicit memory process and a stimulus-level-based change at the peripheral level.

[1]  D. Johnson.  Learning function for a change in the scale of judgment. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Richard L. Doty,et al.  The Human Sense of Smell , 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3]  P. Jurs,et al.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Richard L. Doty,et al.  Psychophysical Measurement of Odor Perception in Humans , 1991 .

[7]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  S. Parker,et al.  The stimulus range effect: Evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. , 1948, Psychological review.

[10]  S. Parker,et al.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  P. Moore.  A model of the role of adaptation and disadaptation in olfactory receptor neurons: implications for the coding of temporal and intensity patterns in odor signals. , 1994, Chemical senses.

[12]  Allen Parducci,et al.  Effects of context in judgments of sweetness and pleasantness , 1979 .

[13]  W S Cain,et al.  Remembered odors and mental mixtures: tapping reservoirs of olfactory knowledge. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  T Lindvall,et al.  Separate and joint scaling of perceived odor intensity ofn-butanol and hydrogen sulfide , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Stevenson Ss,et al.  Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment. , 1958 .

[17]  E. Köster.  Adaption and cross-adaptation in olfaction : an experimental study with olfactory stimuli at low levels of intensity , 1971 .

[18]  R. Doty,et al.  Influence of intertrial interval and sniff-bottle volume on phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection thresholds , 1986 .

[19]  W. Cain,et al.  Thresholds for odor and nasal pungency , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  L. Squire,et al.  Preserved learning and memory in amnesia: intact adaptation-level effects and learning of stereoscopic depth. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  Stephan L. Chorover,et al.  Response plasticity in hamster olfactory bulb: peripheral and central processes , 1976, Brain Research.