A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale)

Abstract Objective: The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report test of auditory disability. The 49 items ask how well a listener would do in many complex listening situations illustrative of real life. The scores on the items are often combined into the three main sections or into 10 pragmatic subscales. We report here a factor analysis of the SSQ that we conducted to further investigate its statistical properties and to determine its structure. Design: Statistical factor analysis of questionnaire data, using parallel analysis to determine the number of factors to retain, oblique rotation of factors, and a bootstrap method to estimate the confidence intervals. Study sample: 1220 people who have attended MRC IHR over the last decade. Results: We found three clear factors, essentially corresponding to the three main sections of the SSQ. They are termed “speech understanding”, “spatial perception”, and “clarity, separation, and identification”. Thirty-five of the SSQ questions were included in the three factors. There was partial evidence for a fourth factor, “effort and concentration”, representing two more questions. Conclusions: These results aid in the interpretation and application of the SSQ and indicate potential methods for generating average scores.

[1]  D. V. Van Demark A factor analysis of the speech of children with cleft palate. , 1966, The Cleft palate journal.

[2]  Michael C. Pyryt Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[3]  Mansze Mok,et al.  Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant? , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[4]  Yasuo Amemiya,et al.  Factor Analysis at 100:Historical Developments and Future Directions , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  T. Most,et al.  Everyday hearing functioning in unilateral versus bilateral hearing aid users. , 2012, American journal of otolaryngology.

[6]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Repairing Tom Swift's Electric Factor Analysis Machine , 2003 .

[7]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Self-assessed hearing abilities in middle- and older-age adults: A stratified sampling approach , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[8]  L. Thurstone The Vectors of Mind , 1935 .

[9]  Alexis Dinno,et al.  Exploring the Sensitivity of Horn's Parallel Analysis to the Distributional Form of Random Data , 2009, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  R. Gonzalez Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[11]  W. Noble,et al.  Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: Comparing self-assessed and measured abilities , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[12]  F. Floyd,et al.  Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. , 1995 .

[13]  M. Akeroyd,et al.  The effect of hearing impairment on localization dominance for single-word stimuli. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S. Brooks,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .

[15]  Örjan Johansson,et al.  Self-assessment of classroom assistive listening devices , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[16]  Robert Cudeck,et al.  Factor analysis at 100 : historical developments and future directions , 2007 .

[17]  Guangjian Zhang,et al.  Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Ordinary Least Squares Factor Loadings and Correlations in Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[19]  B. Thompson,et al.  Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some Guidelines , 1996 .

[20]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  J. Wouters,et al.  Functional benefit of the bone‐anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: objective and subjective measures , 2011, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[22]  W. Velicer,et al.  Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  B. Hagerman,et al.  Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[24]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[25]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[26]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[27]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[28]  M. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Spatial Benefit of Bilateral Hearing Aids , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[30]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[31]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[32]  Gurjit Singh,et al.  Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[33]  Linda Reichwein Zientek,et al.  Applying the bootstrap to the multivariate case: Bootstrap component/factor analysis , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[34]  J. Horn A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[35]  Stanley A. Mulaik,et al.  Factor Analysis at 100 , 2010 .

[36]  A. Reid,et al.  ORIGINAL ARTICLE: The bone‐anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single‐sided deafness: experience with 58 patients , 2010, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[37]  R. Darlington,et al.  Factor Analysis , 2008 .

[38]  M. Browne An Overview of Analytic Rotation in Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2001 .

[39]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[40]  M. Akeroyd,et al.  Two-eared listening in dynamic situations , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[41]  H. Kaiser A second generation little jiffy , 1970 .

[42]  R. Cattell,et al.  A Comprehensive Trial Of The Scree And Kg Criteria For Determining The Number Of Factors. , 1977, Multivariate behavioral research.

[43]  R. Tyler,et al.  Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[44]  B. Price A First Course in Factor Analysis , 1993 .

[45]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  The ear-brain system: approaches to the study and treatment of hearing loss. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[46]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[47]  S. Gatehouse,et al.  Spatial Hearing Disability After Acoustic Neuroma Removal , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[48]  R. M. Durand,et al.  Approximating Confidence Intervals for Factor Loadings. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[49]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[50]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[51]  Richard A. Kass,et al.  The Latent Structure of the Need Satisfying Properties of Leisure Activities , 1979 .

[52]  R. Dowell,et al.  Perceptual Benefit and Functional Outcomes for Children Using Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[53]  T. S. Littler,et al.  British Society of Audiology , 1970 .

[54]  Francis Kuk,et al.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[55]  E. Fransen,et al.  Hearing Disability Measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale in Clinically Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Middle-Aged Persons, and Disability Screening by Means of a Reduced SSQ (the SSQ5) , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[56]  Graham Naylor,et al.  A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: The SSQ12 , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[57]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap , 2004, International Journal of Audiology.

[58]  R. Jennrich Admissible values of γ in direct oblimin rotation , 1979 .

[59]  W F Velicer,et al.  Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[60]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[61]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[62]  Karen S Helfer,et al.  Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[63]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[64]  Sadanori Konishi,et al.  Application of the bootstrap methods in factor analysis , 1995 .

[65]  J. Pohlmann Use and Interpretation of Factor Analysis in The Journal of Educational Research: 1992-2002 , 2004 .

[66]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The effect of frequency-dependent microphone directionality on horizontal localization performance in hearing-aid users , 2009, International journal of audiology.