On the use of active and reactive input power in topology optimization of one-material structures considering steady-state forced vibration problems

Abstract As studied by the authors in a previous work, applying topology optimization to minimize overall dynamic response of structures under time-harmonic loads may present serious drawbacks. It happens e.g. for an excitation frequency above the first resonance of the initial design, especially when the objective is to obtain one-material structures. Essential part of these drawbacks is due to the use of dynamic quantities that present strong influence of local responses, with antiresonances in their frequency spectrum, as is the case of the dynamic compliance. When minimizing for dynamic compliance, density-based topology optimization may present early convergence to designs filled predominantly with intermediate artificial densities. In this article, the authors present their studies on how to overcome these drawbacks by using a better objective function for the problem. The active input power (real part of complex input power) is proportional to time-averaged strain energy and/or to kinetic energy, being a global measure of vibration. Furthermore, it does not have antiresonances in its spectrum. It is illustrated that its minimization produces in most of the cases well defined structures consisting of practically only one material, with reduction of overall vibration at frequencies of interest, even above the first resonance of the initial design. In this work, the authors also show that the application of a constraint on the reactive input power (imaginary part of complex input power) allows to introduce displacement antiresonances for the excitation region at frequencies of interest. Several examples are presented to illustrate the physical issues and the effectiveness of the use of complex input power in topological optimization procedures for overall and local vibration reduction considering harmonic problems.

[1]  B. Auld,et al.  Acoustic fields and waves in solids , 1973 .

[2]  Jakob Søndergaard Jensen,et al.  Topology optimization of dynamics problems with Padé approximants , 2007 .

[3]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Topology optimization in structural and continuum mechanics , 2014 .

[4]  Alejandro R. Diaz,et al.  Frequency response as a surrogate eigenvalue problem in topology optimization , 2018 .

[5]  Zhengguang Li,et al.  A method for topology optimization of structures under harmonic excitations , 2018 .

[6]  N. Olhoff,et al.  Generalized incremental frequency method for topological designof continuum structures for minimum dynamic compliance subject to forced vibration at a prescribed low or high value of the excitation frequency , 2016 .

[7]  M. M. Neves,et al.  Generalized topology design of structures with a buckling load criterion , 1995 .

[8]  B. Niu,et al.  On objective functions of minimizing the vibration response of continuum structures subjected to external harmonic excitation , 2018 .

[9]  James K. Guest,et al.  Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions , 2004 .

[10]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Energy and Finite Element Methods In Structural Mechanics : SI Units , 2017 .

[11]  Michaël Bruyneel,et al.  Composite structures optimization using sequential convex programming , 2000 .

[12]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Damping modelling using generalized proportional damping , 2006 .

[13]  D. Tortorelli,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis: Overview and review , 1994 .

[14]  M. M. Neves,et al.  Shape preserving design of vibrating structures using topology optimization , 2018 .

[15]  T. E. Bruns,et al.  Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[16]  Niels Olhoff Topology Optimization of Structures Against Vibration and Noise Emission , 2005 .

[17]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[18]  M. M. Neves,et al.  A critical analysis of using the dynamic compliance as objective function in topology optimization of one-material structures considering steady-state forced vibration problems , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[19]  M. M. Neves,et al.  On the Use of Complex Input Power in Topology Optimization of One-Material Vibrating Structures for Obtaining Displacement Anti-resonances Close to Frequencies of Interest , 2018, EngOpt 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Optimization.

[20]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[21]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[22]  Shengli Xu,et al.  Volume preserving nonlinear density filter based on heaviside functions , 2010 .

[23]  C. Jog Topology design of structures subjected to periodic loading , 2002 .

[24]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[25]  Krister Svanberg,et al.  A Class of Globally Convergent Optimization Methods Based on Conservative Convex Separable Approximations , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[26]  M. Bendsøe Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[27]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  On Topological Design Optimization of Structures Against Vibration and Noise Emission , 2008 .

[28]  J. Antonio,et al.  Power flow in structures during steady-state forced vibration , 1984 .