Knowing What the Peer Knows: The Differential Effect of Knowledge Awareness on Collaborative Learning Performance of Asymmetric Pairs

In an empirical study, we provided (or not) pairs of students working in a remote collaborative learning situation with a knowledge awareness tool that provided learner A with learner B's level of knowledge measured through a pre-test. We analyzed the effect of the knowledge awareness tool on asymmetric pairs with regards to the prior-knowledge. Post-hoc analysis on the pairs' knowledge level showed that the knowledge awareness tool mainly affects the learning performances of asymmetric pairs. Further analysis on the learners' level showed that the knowledge awareness tool mainly affects the collaborative learning gain of the more-knowledgeable peers of asymmetric pairs. The results are discussed in light of socio-cognitive processes such as audience design and perspective taking.

[1]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Facilitating interpersonal evaluation of knowledge in a context of distributed team collaboration , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Perspective-Taking in Communication: Representations of Others' Knowledge in Reference , 1991 .

[3]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[4]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[5]  Mina Verba,et al.  Tutoring Interactions between Young Children: How Symmetry can Modify Asymmetrical Interactions , 1998 .

[6]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  How We Know—and Sometimes Misjudge—What Others Know: Imputing One's Own Knowledge to Others , 1999 .

[7]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Combining Knowledge Awareness and Information Filtering in an Open-ended Collaborative Learning Environment , 2000 .

[8]  Jörg Wittwer,et al.  Is underestimation less detrimental than overestimation? The impact of experts’ beliefs about a layperson’s knowledge on learning and question asking , 2008 .

[9]  B. Rogoff.  Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[10]  N. Webb.  Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[11]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[12]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[13]  Matthias Nückles,et al.  The assessment tool: a method to support asynchronous communication between computer experts and laypersons , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  A. King.  Transactive Peer Tutoring: Distributing Cognition and Metacognition , 1998 .

[15]  M. Chi,et al.  Can Tutors Monitor Students' Understanding Accurately? , 2004 .

[16]  Matthias Nückles,et al.  Information about a layperson's knowledge supports experts in giving effective and efficient online advice to laypersons. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[19]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Expert-Layperson-Communication , 2005 .

[20]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[21]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .