A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research.

[1]  J. McGowan,et al.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Dimitris Mavridis,et al.  Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[3]  José M. Merigó,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science , 2017 .

[4]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  重川 須賀子,et al.  システマティックレビュー検索式査読のためのガイドライン : PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies , 2017 .

[6]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. , 2017, Canadian journal of diabetes.

[7]  I. Boutron,et al.  Published randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa focus on high-burden diseases but are frequently funded and led by high-income countries. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  E. Bass,et al.  A Systematic Review of Research Gaps in the Evaluation and Management of Localized Renal Masses. , 2016, Urology.

[9]  Birte Snilstveit,et al.  Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  H. Kitchener,et al.  Working together to shape the endometrial cancer research agenda: The top ten unanswered research questions. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Patient, family-centred care interventions within the adult ICU setting: An integrative review. , 2016, Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.

[12]  G. Lipkin,et al.  Defining Priorities for Future Research: Results of the UK Kidney Transplant Priority Setting Partnership , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Automatic classification of registered clinical trials towards the Global Burden of Diseases taxonomy of diseases and injuries , 2016, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  K. Cowan,et al.  Top 10 research priorities for eating disorders. , 2016, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[15]  J. McGowan,et al.  PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  E. Schmidt,et al.  Availability of evidence on cataract in low/middle-income settings: a review of reviews using evidence gap maps approach , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  V. Welch,et al.  Critical EPICOT items were absent in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews: a bibliometric analysis. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[19]  E. Oren,et al.  Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Updated Research Agenda , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  E. Larson,et al.  Clinical nursing and midwifery research: grey literature in African countries. , 2016, International nursing review.

[21]  Susanne Hempel,et al.  What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[23]  J. Scott Parrott,et al.  Creating a literature database of low-calorie sweeteners and health studies: evidence mapping , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[24]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Differential Globalization of Industry- and Non-Industry–Sponsored Clinical Trials , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  C. Calderwood,et al.  Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  A. Ingold,et al.  Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership , 2015, BMJ Open.

[27]  J. V. van Middendorp,et al.  Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[28]  A. Tod,et al.  Prognostic communication in cancer: A critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. , 2015, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[29]  Sachiyo Yoshida,et al.  Approaches, tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21st century , 2015, Journal of global health.

[30]  Michelle Fiander,et al.  Implementation research in emergency medicine: a systematic scoping review , 2015, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[31]  D. Parker,et al.  Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.

[32]  W. Young,et al.  Is the endocrine research pipeline broken? A systematic evaluation of the Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines and trial registration , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[33]  D. Friedman,et al.  Setting Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research on Management of Primary Angle Closure: A Survey of Asia-Pacific Clinicians , 2015, Journal of glaucoma.

[34]  Igor Rudan,et al.  Assembling GHERG: Could “academic crowd–sourcing” address gaps in global health estimates? , 2015, Journal of global health.

[35]  Luci K. Leykum,et al.  A patient-centered research agenda for the care of the acutely ill older patient. , 2015, Journal of hospital medicine.

[36]  P. Major,et al.  Biomarkers associated with obstructive sleep apnea and morbidities: a scoping review. , 2015, Sleep medicine.

[37]  C. Karner,et al.  Cochrane Airways Group reviews were prioritized for updating using a pragmatic approach. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  Stacey L. Sheridan,et al.  The Psychological Harms of Screening: the Evidence We Have Versus the Evidence We Need , 2015, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[39]  S. Baral,et al.  Fertility-related research needs among women at the margins , 2015, Reproductive health matters.

[40]  J. Ingram,et al.  The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Priority Setting Partnership , 2014, The British journal of dermatology.

[41]  Kimberly C. Thomson,et al.  A scoping study to identify opportunities to advance the ethical implementation and scale-up of HIV treatment as prevention: priorities for empirical research , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[42]  M. Bigdeli,et al.  Stakeholders’ perspectives on access-to-medicines policy and research priorities in Latin America and the Caribbean: face-to-face and web-based interviews , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[43]  Matthew J. Crowley,et al.  Prioritization of Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research for Osteoarthritis , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  Matthew J. Crowley,et al.  Prioritization of Research Addressing Management Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[45]  A. Pollock,et al.  Top 10 Research Priorities Relating to Life after Stroke – Consensus from Stroke Survivors, Caregivers, and Health Professionals , 2014, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[46]  X. Bonfill,et al.  A survey study identified global research priorities for decreasing maternal mortality. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[47]  A. Pollock,et al.  Development of a new model to engage patients and clinicians in setting research priorities , 2014, Journal of health services research & policy.

[48]  C. Umscheid.  A Primer on Performing Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. , 2013, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[49]  D. Weed,et al.  Evidence mapping: methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[50]  G. Antes,et al.  Methoden des Evidence Mappings , 2013, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[51]  Robert F Terry,et al.  Use of data from registered clinical trials to identify gaps in health research and development. , 2013, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[52]  A. Grant,et al.  Case study: a patient-clinician collaboration that identified and prioritized evidence gaps and stimulated research development. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[53]  Emma Tavender,et al.  Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a Global Evidence Mapping approach. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[54]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[55]  Cees P M van der Vleuten,et al.  Learning in context: identifying gaps in research on the transfer of medical communication skills to the clinical workplace. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[56]  C. Hartnick,et al.  Clinical Consensus Statement , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[57]  C. Turkelson,et al.  Using health technology assessment to identify gaps in evidence and inform study design for comparative effectiveness research. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  F. Impellizzeri,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: a primer. , 2012, International journal of sports physical therapy.

[59]  J. Petrie,et al.  Setting research priorities for Type 1 diabetes , 2012, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[60]  G. Sanders,et al.  Identifying Research Needs for Improving Health Care , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[61]  M. Kho,et al.  The systematic review and bibliometric network analysis (SeBriNA) is a new method to contextualize evidence. Part 1: description. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[62]  C. Cooper,et al.  A global representation of vitamin D status in healthy populations , 2012, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[63]  S. Mickenautsch.  Research gaps identified during systematic reviews of clinical trials: glass-ionomer cements , 2012, BMC oral health.

[64]  S. Vedula,et al.  What Comparative Effectiveness Research Is Needed? A Framework for Using Guidelines and Systematic Reviews to Identify Evidence Gaps and Research Priorities , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[65]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[66]  A. Lophatananon,et al.  THE JAMES LIND ALLIANCE APPROACH TO PRIORITY SETTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH: AN INTEGRATIVE METHODOLOGY BASED ON PATIENT AND CLINICIAN PARTICIPATION , 2011, BJU international.

[67]  S. Brearley,et al.  The physical and practical problems experienced by cancer survivors: a rapid review and synthesis of the literature. , 2011, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[68]  E. Effa,et al.  Priority setting for systematic review of health care interventions in Nigeria. , 2011, Health policy.

[69]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Geographical Representativeness of Published and Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials. The Example of: Tobacco Consumption and HIV Infection , 2011, PloS one.

[70]  Robert F Terry,et al.  A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice , 2010, Health research policy and systems.

[71]  Sarah E Hetrick,et al.  Evidence mapping: illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health. , 2010, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[72]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[73]  A. Grant,et al.  Reaching a consensus and ranking research priorities in urinary incontinence. , 2010, Nursing times.

[74]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  The knowledge-to-action cycle: identifying the gaps , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[75]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence , 2009, The Lancet.

[76]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[77]  A. Howell,et al.  Evaluation of the current knowledge limitations in breast cancer research: a gap analysis , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[78]  C. Moga,et al.  Using health technology assessment to identify research gaps: an unexploited resource for increasing the value of clinical research. , 2008, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante.

[79]  Richard Horton,et al.  Putting clinical trials into context , 2005, The Lancet.

[80]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[81]  M. Bracken,et al.  The evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine: methods of Evidence Mapping with application to CAM. , 2003, Alternative therapies in health and medicine.

[82]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews , 1994, BMJ.

[83]  Mona Nasser,et al.  Setting priorities for conducting and updating systematic reviews , 2018 .

[84]  J. Selby,et al.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute , 2017 .

[85]  Johann Kranz,et al.  A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews , 2015, ICIS.

[86]  Evelina Chapman,et al.  Cochrane systematic reviews are useful to map research gaps for decreasing maternal mortality. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[87]  S. Wesche,et al.  Trends in Métis-related Health Research (1980–2009): Identification of Research Gaps , 2012, Canadian Journal of Public Health.

[88]  M. Shaughnessy,et al.  Q & A with ed tech leaders: Interview with Roger Kaufman , 2008 .