Robust Segmentation for Low Quality Cell Images from Blood and Bone Marrow

Biomedical image is often complex. An applied image analysis system should deal with the images which are of quite low quality and are challenging to segment. This paper presents a framework for color cell image segmentation by learning and classification online. It is a robust two-stage scheme using kernel method and watershed transform. In first stage, a two- class SVM is employed to discriminate the pixels of object from background; where the SVM is trained on the data which has been analyzed using the mean shift procedure. A real-time training strategy is also developed for SVM. In second stage, as the post-processing, local watershed transform is used to separate clustering cells. Comparison with the SSF (Scale space filter) and classical watershed-based algorithm (those are often employed for cell image segmentation) is given. Experimental results demonstrate that the new method is more accurate and robust than compared methods. The analysis of blood and bone marrow slides is a powerful diagnostic tool for the detection of leukemia. In order to determine the type of leukemia, the different lineages and maturity levels of white blood cells, which come from peripheral blood or bone marrow, need be recognized and counted. Whereas systems for the analysis of stained blood cells (either using flow cytometric methods or panoptically stained blood slides) that yield a pre-classification are commercially available, the analysis of bone marrow smears is much more difficult (1).

[1]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Computer-assisted discrimination among malignant lymphomas and leukemia using immunophenotyping, intelligent image repositories, and telemicroscopy , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Design efficient support vector machine for fast classification , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[5]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Soft Margins for AdaBoost , 2001, Machine Learning.

[6]  Madhukar C. Pandit,et al.  Analysis of blood and bone marrow smears using digital image processing techniques , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Guosheng Wang,et al.  H 2 -optimal Control with Regional Pole Assignment via State Feedback , 2006 .

[8]  Mark J. Carlotto,et al.  Histogram Analysis Using a Scale-Space Approach , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Color image segmentation , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[10]  Jing Li Wang,et al.  Color image segmentation: advances and prospects , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Colin Campbell,et al.  Algorithmic approaches to training Support Vector Machines: a survey , 2000, ESANN.

[12]  J J Vaquero,et al.  Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. , 1998, Cytometry.

[13]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  Segmentation of ultrasonic images using Support Vector Machines , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  Zhengzhong Bian,et al.  Region-based Vessel Segmentation Using Level Set Framework , 2006 .