Effects of High-Intensity Airborne Ultrasound Exposure on Behavioural and Electrophysiological Measures of Auditory Function

Regulations on safe ultrasound exposure limits are based on a very limited number of studies, which have only considered audiometric threshold shifts as indicators of hearing deficits. The purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of exposure to high-intensity ultrasound on a range of measures of hearing function, which included audiometric thresholds, as well as subclinical measures of hearing deficits: speech-in-noise understanding, supra-threshold auditory brainstem response wave I amplitude and latency, and frequency following response levels to amplitude modulated (AM) tones. Changes in these measures were assessed before and after exposure of the left ear to high-intensity ultrasound in a group of nine young listeners. These changes were compared to those observed in a control group of nine young listeners. Exposure consisted in the presentation of a 40-kHz AM tone at levels of 105, 110, 115, and 120 dB SPL for 10 minutes at each level, plus an exposure to a 40-kHz unmodulated tone during an ultrasound detection task, for a total duration of 50 seconds. None of the measures of hearing function was found to change significantly more for the left compared to the right ear, for participants of the exposure group compared to control participants. Electroencephalographic recordings obtained during exposure to the AM tone did not show significant phase-locked activity at the modulation frequency or at low-frequency subharmonics of the ultrasound tone. One out of nine participants was able to perform the ultrasound detection task above chance level, although due to limitations of the experimental setup the mechanism by which she could detect the presentation of the tone remains unclear.

[1]  G. Prendergast,et al.  Reliability and interrelations of seven proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy , 2019, Hearing Research.

[2]  H. Ross,et al.  An improved procedure for assessing ABR latency in young subjects based on a new normative data set. , 1995, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[3]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. Prendergast,et al.  Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure , 2018, Hearing Research.

[5]  Brian M. Kreisman,et al.  Equivalence and test–retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli , 2017, International journal of audiology.

[6]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R. H. Wilson,et al.  Effect of step size on clinical and adaptive 2IFC procedures in quiet and in a noise background. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  Martin A. Stoffel,et al.  rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2017 .

[9]  M. Grigor'eva Effect of ultrasonic vibrations on personnel working with ultrasonic equipment , 1966 .

[10]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  UltraHaptics: multi-point mid-air haptic feedback for touch surfaces , 2013, UIST.

[11]  T W Picton,et al.  Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  M. Florentine,et al.  Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.