Utilization of radial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in New York.

[1]  L. Jacoby.  Effects of Radial versus Femoral Artery Access in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes with or without ST-segment Elevation , 2013 .

[2]  J. Messenger,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyThe Prevalence and Outcomes of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Analysis From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011) , 2013 .

[3]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: ready for prime time? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Sarabjeet Singh,et al.  Comparison between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  D. Kim,et al.  The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  Yanbo Wang,et al.  Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with STEMI undergoing early PCI following intravenous thrombolysis. , 2012, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[8]  Bruce Y. Lee,et al.  Systematic Review and Cost–Benefit Analysis of Radial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  J. Molnar,et al.  Safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials , 2012, Coronary artery disease.

[10]  Lawrence Joseph,et al.  Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. , 2012, American heart journal.

[11]  A. Shimony,et al.  Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  M. Robertson,et al.  Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  M. Valgimigli,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-adjusted and -matched analysis from the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) multicenter registry. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  G. Stone,et al.  Radial access in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. , 2011, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  Helen Routledge,et al.  Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2011, Heart.

[16]  Cher Heng Tan,et al.  Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and high-risk patients: experience in a single centre without cardiothoracic surgical backup. , 2011, Singapore medical journal.

[17]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2011, American heart journal.

[18]  Z. Kalarus,et al.  Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial. , 2011, Kardiologia polska.

[19]  Z. Siudak,et al.  Transradial approach in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with abciximab results in fewer bleeding complications: data from EUROTRANSFER registry , 2010, Coronary artery disease.

[20]  D. Bandorski,et al.  A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  J D Hilton,et al.  Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) , 2008, Heart.