Performance of Contra-Rotating Propellers for Stratospheric Airships

Small advance ratio and low Reynolds number of stratospheric propulsion system bring lots of challenges to the design of propellers. Contra-rotating propeller configuration is proposed to improve the propulsion efficiency. In this paper, the feasibility of contra-rotating propeller for stratospheric airship has been assessed and its performance has been investigated by wind tunnel tests. The experimental results indicate, at relatively low Reynolds number, although the advance ratio is fixed, the performance of propellers is different with variation of Reynolds number. Moreover, at the same Reynolds number, the efficiency of contra-rotating propeller achieved appears to be a few percent greater than that for a standard conventional propulsion system. It can be concluded that contra-rotating propellers would be an efficient means to improve the performance of stratospheric airship propulsion system.

[1]  H. Wainauski,et al.  Aerodynamic performance of a counter rotating Prop-Fan , 1986 .

[2]  Grant E. Carichner,et al.  Fundamentals of Aircraft and Airship Design, Volume 2 – Airship Design and Case Studies , 2013 .

[3]  Janusz Piechna,et al.  Contra‐rotating propeller for fixed wing MAV: part 2 , 2013 .

[4]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Near-space station-keeping performance of a large high-altitude notional airship , 2006 .

[5]  Isaac R. Porche,et al.  High-Altitude Airships for the Future Force Army , 2005 .

[6]  M. Selig,et al.  High-Lift Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design , 1997 .

[7]  David Biermann,et al.  Wind-Tunnel Tests of Four- and Six-Blade Single- and Dual-Rotating Tractor Propellers , 1942 .

[8]  Anthony Colozza,et al.  Initial Feasibility Assessment of a High Altitude Long Endurance Airship , 2013 .

[9]  D. C. Wisler,et al.  Rotor-rotor interaction for counter-rotating fans. I - Three-dimensional flowfield measurements , 1994 .

[10]  M. Selig.  Summary of low speed airfoil data , 1995 .

[11]  Quentin R. Wald.  The aerodynamics of propellers , 2006 .

[12]  Eric R Moomey,et al.  Technical Feasibility of Loitering Lighter-Than-Air Near-Space Maneuvering Vehicles , 2012 .

[13]  Akira Oyama,et al.  Computational and Experimental Analysis of a High-Performance Airfoil Under Low-Reynolds-Number Flow Condition , 2014 .

[14]  Andreas Schröder,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a Contra Rotating Open-Rotor Flowfield , 2012 .

[15]  Stephen J. Kline,et al.  The Purposes of Uncertainty Analysis , 1985 .

[16]  Edward Pepper,et al.  The Characteristics of Two Model Six-blade Counterrotating Pusher Propellers of Conventional and Improved Aerodynamic Design , 1942 .

[17]  Jens Nørkær Sørensen,et al.  The rotor theories by Professor Joukowsky: Vortex theories , 2015 .

[18]  J. Sokhey,et al.  Analysis of counter-rotating propeller performance , 1985 .

[19]  W H Gray.  Wind-tunnel Tests of Single- and Dual-rotating Pusher Propellers Having from Three to Eight Blades , 1942 .