Ipsilateral Rotational Autokeratoplasty: An Alternative to Penetrating Keratoplasty in Nonprogressive Central Corneal Scars

Purpose. To report the outcome of ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty performed for nonprogressive central corneal opacities. Methods. Medical records of 27 patients who underwent ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty between June 1995 and December 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. The etiology of corneal opacity, preoperative visual acuity, and size of the trephine used was noted. Any intraoperative and early and late postoperative complications were noted in all patients. The final outcome, visual acuity, and astigmatism at final correction were analyzed. Results. The main etiology of corneal opacity was trauma (44.4%), followed by resolved keratitis (29.6%). The size of the graft ranged from 6.5 to 9 mm. Fifteen patients underwent autokeratoplasty alone; additional procedures were combined in the remaining 12. Wound leak was the most common postoperative complication, which was seen in seven patients. The mean follow-up was 12.11 months (SD = 11.95 months). Five patients (18.5%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 22, 19 (86.36%) had clear grafts and 3 (13.6%) had failed grafts. The mean astigmatism at final correction was 4.25 diopters cylinder (SD = 2.72). Final visual acuity of 20/80 or better was obtained in 13 cases (59.09%). Conclusions. Contrary to common belief, ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty is a safe and effective surgical procedure. It can be considered as an alternative procedure to penetrating keratoplasty in a scenario in which tissue scarcity exists, as well as in cases that have a high risk of developing immunologic allograft rejection. Further prospective studies with preoperative specular microscopy and postoperative corneal topography will provide greater insight into the usefulness of this procedure.

[1]  N. Verma,et al.  Ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty for the management of corneal opacities. , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  T. Hahn,et al.  Rotational autokeratoplasty in advanced lipid keratopathy. , 1997, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[3]  F. Price,et al.  Bilateral penetrating autokeratoplasty. , 1995, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  N. Bobrova [Reconstruction of the anterior eye segment in children based on penetrating rotary autokeratoplasty]. , 1990, Oftalmologicheskii Zhurnal.

[5]  E. Frau,et al.  [Rotational penetrating autokeratoplasty. Report of 10 cases in West Africa]. , 1990, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[6]  Kasparov Aa,et al.  [Open auto-keratoplasty and reflected-light microscopy of the endothelium]. , 1989 .

[7]  A. A. Kasparov,et al.  [Open auto-keratoplasty and reflected-light microscopy of the endothelium]. , 1989, Vestnik oftal mologii.

[8]  P. McDonnell,et al.  Rotational autokeratoplasty , 1989, Eye.

[9]  Groden Lr,et al.  Ipsilateral rotating autokeratoplasty. , 1983 .

[10]  L. Groden,et al.  Ipsilateral rotating autokeratoplasty. , 1983, Annals of ophthalmology.

[11]  L. P. Robinson Keratoplasty following anterior segment trauma. , 1981, Australian journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Brubaker,et al.  A method for ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty. , 1978, Ophthalmology.

[13]  G. Naumann,et al.  [Ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty (author's transl)]. , 1977, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[14]  J. Vasco-Posada Ipsilateral autokeratoplasty. , 1967, American journal of ophthalmology.