Integrated Workflows: Generating Feedback Between Digital and Physical Realms

As design thinking shifted away from conventional methods with the rapid adoption of computer-aided design and fabrication technologies, architects have been seeking ways to initiate a comprehensive dialogue between the virtual and the material realms. Current methodologies do not offer embodied workflows that utilize the feedback obtained through a subsequent transition process between physical and digital design. Therefore, narrowing the separation between these two platforms remains as a research problem. This literature review elaborates the divide between physical and digital design, testing and manufacturing techniques in the morphological process of architectural form. We first review the digital transformation in the architectural design discourse. Then, we proceed by introducing a variety of methods that are integrating digital and physical workflows and suggesting an alternative approach. Our work unveils that there is a need for empirical research with a focus on integrated approaches to create intuitively embodied experiences for architectural designers.

[1]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation , 2013, UIST.

[2]  Scott Marble,et al.  Digital Workflows in Architecture: Design - Assembly - Industry , 2012 .

[3]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Digital by Material , 2013 .

[4]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  ReForm: Integrating Physical and Digital Design through Bidirectional Fabrication , 2015, UIST.

[5]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  NatCut: an interactive tangible editor for physical object fabrication , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Beyond Hybrids: Metaphors and Margins in Design , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[7]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium , 2008 .

[8]  Bernhard Rinner,et al.  Towards Learning to Handle Deviations Using User Preferences in a Human Robot Collaboration Scenario , 2016, IHCI.

[9]  Wei Xie,et al.  Garden: A Mixed Reality Experience Combining Virtual Reality and 3D Reconstruction , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Jan Knippers,et al.  Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Hybrid crafting: towards an integrated practice of crafting with physical and digital components , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[12]  Nancy J. Frishberg Prototyping with junk , 2006, INTR.

[13]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Multi-user interaction on media facades through live video on mobile devices , 2011, CHI.

[14]  Olga Sorkine-Hornung,et al.  Assembling self-supporting structures , 2014, ACM Trans. Graph..

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[16]  Camilla Groth Making Sense Through Hands: Design And Craft Practice Analysed As Embodied Cognition , 2017 .

[17]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Materiable: Rendering Dynamic Material Properties in Response to Direct Physical Touch with Shape Changing Interfaces , 2016, CHI.

[18]  TerzopoulosDemetri,et al.  Elastically deformable models , 1987 .

[19]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  The rototack: designing a computationally-enhanced craft item , 2000, DARE '00.

[20]  Nick Dunn,et al.  Digital Fabrication in Architecture , 2012 .

[21]  Sean Follmer,et al.  FAB at CHI: digital fabrication tools, design, and community , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Juhani Pallasmaa,et al.  The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses , 1996 .

[23]  Ute Hoffmann,et al.  The Eyes of the Skin , 2024 .

[24]  Malcolm McCullough,et al.  Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand , 1996 .

[25]  Clement Zheng,et al.  Combining Practices in Craft and Design , 2017, TEI.

[26]  Amit Zoran,et al.  Hybrid Craft: Showcase of Physical and Digital Integration of Design and Craft Skills , 2015, Leonardo.

[27]  Michael Budig,et al.  Integrating Robotic Fabrication in the Design Process , 2014 .

[28]  Lian Loke,et al.  Touch toolkit: a method to convey touch-based design knowledge and skills , 2014, TEI '14.

[29]  Caitlin Mueller,et al.  Using 3D direct manipulation for real-time structural design exploration , 2018 .

[30]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  SPATA: Spatio-Tangible Tools for Fabrication-Aware Design , 2015, TEI.

[31]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization , 2015, CHI.

[32]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Joinery: Parametric Joint Generation for Laser Cut Assemblies , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[33]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Computer power and human reason , 1976, SGAR.

[34]  Fumihisa Shibata,et al.  Enjoyable carving with ChiselDevice in mixed reality space , 2017, VRST.

[35]  Jeremy Warner,et al.  MatchSticks: Woodworking through Improvisational Digital Fabrication , 2018, CHI.

[36]  Sven Gehring,et al.  Designing interaction with media façades: a case study , 2012, DIS '12.

[37]  Kostas Terzidis,et al.  Algorithmic Architecture , 2006 .

[38]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Illuminating clay: a 3-D tangible interface for landscape analysis , 2002, CHI.

[39]  John S. Gero,et al.  Characterizing Tangible Interaction During a Creative Combination Task , 2017 .

[40]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  FreeD: a freehand digital sculpting tool , 2013, CHI.

[41]  Satoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Teddy: a sketching interface for 3D freeform design , 2006, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[42]  Geoff Tsai,et al.  Process Products: Capturing Design Iteration with Digital Fabrication , 2015, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[43]  Daniel Vogel Form+Code in Design, Art, and Architecture, by Casey Reas, Chandler McWilliams, and LUST , 2012 .

[44]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Tangible interaction + graphical interpretation: a new approach to 3D modeling , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[45]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Affordances for manipulation of physical versus digital media on interactive surfaces , 2007, CHI.

[46]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Automated assembly as situated development: using artificial ontogenies to evolve buildable 3-D objects , 2005, GECCO '05.

[47]  Satoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Teddy: A Sketching Interface for 3D Freeform Design , 1999, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[48]  Milena Stavric,et al.  Architectural Scale Models in the Digital Age: design, representation and manufacturing , 2013 .

[49]  Yoichiro Kawaguchi Gemotion Screen: A Generative, Emotional, Interactive 3D Display , 2008 .

[50]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of physical visualizations , 2013, CHI.

[51]  A. Streri,et al.  Touching for knowing : cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception , 2003 .

[52]  Eric Paulos,et al.  MetaMorphe: Designing Expressive 3D Models for Digital Fabrication , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[53]  Wesley Willett,et al.  Building with Data: Architectural Models as Inspiration for Data Physicalization , 2017, CHI.

[54]  Daniel Ashbrook,et al.  Towards Augmented Fabrication: Combining Fabricated and Existing Objects , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[55]  Amit Zoran Hybrid craft: showcase of physical and digital integration of design and craft skills , 2015, SIGGRAPH '15.

[56]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  Tactile Display for Virtual 3D Shape Rendering , 2017 .

[57]  Frédéric Waimer,et al.  Computer-Aided Design , 2021, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[58]  Edward F. Melcer,et al.  Motion, Emotion, and Form: Exploring Affective Dimensions of Shape , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[59]  Andrés Lucero Funky-Design-Spaces: Interactive Environments for Creativity Inspired by Observing Designers Making Mood Boards , 2015, INTERACT.

[60]  Keenan Crane,et al.  Beyond developable , 2016, ACM Trans. Graph..

[61]  Albena Yaneva,et al.  Citations (this article cites 5 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): , 2022 .

[62]  M. Paterson The Senses of Touch , 2020 .

[63]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  Interactive fabrication: new interfaces for digital fabrication , 2010, TEI.

[64]  Mathias Kluge,et al.  Towards A New Architecture , 2016 .

[65]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Relief: a scalable actuated shape display , 2010, TEI '10.

[66]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  An interface for virtual 3D sculpting via physical proxy , 2006, GRAPHITE '06.

[67]  Mary Lou Maher Creativity, Computation, and Interaction , 2008 .

[68]  Achim Menges,et al.  Fusing the Computational and the Physical: Towards a Novel Material Culture , 2015 .

[69]  Amit Zoran,et al.  D-Coil: A Hands-on Approach to Digital 3D Models Design , 2015, CHI.

[70]  Peter Christensen,et al.  Home Delivery: Fabricating The Modern Dwelling , 2008 .

[71]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education , 2016, FabLearn.

[72]  Hod Lipson,et al.  ModelCraft: capturing freehand annotations and edits on physical 3D models , 2006, UIST.

[73]  John C. Platt,et al.  Elastically deformable models , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[74]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Design issues when using commodity gaming devices for virtual object manipulation , 2012, FDG.

[75]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Framing, aligning, paradoxing, abstracting, and directing: how design mood boards work , 2012, DIS '12.

[76]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Laser origami: laser-cutting 3D objects , 2014, INTR.

[77]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  The makers' movement and FabLabs in education: experiences, technologies, and research , 2013, IDC.

[78]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Architecture-scale human-assisted additive manufacturing , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[79]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[80]  Patrick Janssen,et al.  Evolutionary Design Systems and Generative Processes , 2002, Applied Intelligence.

[81]  Sven Gehring,et al.  Interaction with Media Façades , 2014, Informatik-Spektrum.

[82]  Casey Reas,et al.  Form+Code in Design, Art, and Architecture , 2010 .

[83]  J. Mitani,et al.  Making papercraft toys from meshes using strip-based approximate unfolding , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[84]  Fumihisa Shibata,et al.  Enjoying virtual handcrafting with ToolDevice , 2012, UIST Adjunct Proceedings '12.

[85]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Recompose: direct and gestural interaction with an actuated surface , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[86]  John H. Frazer,et al.  An Evolutionary Architecture , 1995 .

[87]  Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen,et al.  Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions , 2012, CHI.

[88]  Francesco Iorio,et al.  Parameters tell the design story: ideation and abstraction in design optimization , 2014, ANSS 2014.

[89]  Branko Kolarevic,et al.  Manufacturing Material Effects: Rethinking Design and Making in Architecture , 2008 .

[90]  Riccardo La Magna,et al.  Form-Finding and Design Potentials of Bending-Active Plate Structures , 2015 .

[91]  Douglas Bryden CAD and Rapid Prototyping for Product Design , 2014 .

[92]  Toni Robertson,et al.  The lived body in design: mapping the terrain , 2011, OZCHI.

[93]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Creating physical visualizations with makervis , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[94]  M. Gamerre,et al.  [Home delivery]. , 1994, Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique.

[95]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Codeable objects: computational design and digital fabrication for novice programmers , 2013, CHI.

[96]  Shajay Bhooshan,et al.  Use of sub-division surfaces in architectural form-finding and procedural modelling , 2011, SpringSim.

[97]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  BUILD-IT: An Intuitive Design Tool Based on Direct Object Manipulation , 1997, Gesture Workshop.

[98]  Simon Stusak Exploring the Potential of Physical Visualizations , 2015, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[99]  Camilla Groth,et al.  Design- and Craft thinking analysed as Embodied Cognition , 2016 .

[100]  Manuel DeLanda,et al.  The New Materiality , 2015 .

[101]  Lambros Malafouris,et al.  Models, Mathematics and Materials in Digital Architecture , 2017, Cognition Beyond the Brain.