Supporting urban change: Using a MOOC to facilitate attitudinal learning and participation in smart cities

Smart cities try to use technology and data to improve the efficiency of city services, to address societal challenges and to improve collaboration between citizens and government. Driving such social change requires a deep socio-ecological transition with both organisations and individual's lifestyles needing to change. This has led to an increasing recognition of the need for education to empower people to play a more active role within smart city initiatives. This paper examines our use of a MOOC as a tool to facilitate attitudinal learning around the topic of smart cities and to explore whether the learners engage in local smart city activities. A mixed methods research design was employed, collecting data via an online survey that was completed by 202 learners and through in-depth interviews with 8 of those learners. The results show that learners’ perceived high levels of attitudinal learning on the topic of smart cities across four categories of learning outcomes (general, cognitive, affective and behavioural). Our findings also contribute to an understanding of the types of post-course activities learners participate in and their experiences of trying to apply what they learnt if they participated in local smart city activities. We conclude by providing new insights into how to design for learning to support social change in the context of a MOOC.

[1]  William R. Watson,et al.  Perceived learning in three MOOCs targeting attitudinal change , 2016 .

[2]  Venkataraman Balaji,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs: A Guide for Policy-Makers in Developing Countries , 2016 .

[3]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[4]  Robert A. Reiser A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design , 2001 .

[5]  Ingrid Mulder Sociable Smart Cities: Rethinking Our Future through Co-creative Partnerships , 2014, HCI.

[6]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues , 2003 .

[7]  Mark Evan Segal,et al.  The Intelligenter Method (II) for “smarter” urban policy-making and regulation drafting , 2017 .

[8]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes , 1979 .

[9]  Lorraine Hudson,et al.  Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale , 2018 .

[10]  Sylila Monteiro,et al.  Creating Social Change: The Ultimate Goal of Education for Sustainability , 2014 .

[11]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[12]  Margarita Angelidou,et al.  Smart city policies: A spatial approach , 2014 .

[13]  Inmaculada Maiz Olazabalaga,et al.  Research on MOOCs : Trends and Methodologies , 2016 .

[14]  I. Mulder,et al.  A Participatory Approach for Envisioning a Smart City , 2016 .

[15]  Rikke Toft Nørgård,et al.  Critical reflection and dialogical learning design: moving MOOCs beyond unidirectional transmission of content , 2016 .

[16]  Executive Summary World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision , 2019 .

[17]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Activity Theory As a Lens for Characterizing the Participatory Unit. , 2004 .

[18]  Jesse M. Shapiro Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Learning in MOOCs: A Comparison Study, Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs , 2016 .

[20]  William R. Watson,et al.  Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an Animal Behavior and Welfare MOOC , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  Do Massive Open Online Course Platforms Support Employability? , 2016, CSCW.

[22]  C. Preist,et al.  ICT practices in smart sustainable cities : In the intersection of technological solutions and practices of everyday life , 2015 .

[23]  William R. Watson,et al.  Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Hossam Haick,et al.  Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Stephen Griffin,et al.  Attitude change. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[26]  Francesca Rizzo,et al.  Design and social innovation for the development of human smart cities , 2015, Nordic Design Research Conference.

[27]  Kathy Enger,et al.  A Multi-Cultural Transformative Approach to Learning: Assessing Attitude Change in Doctoral Students following an Online Diversity Course. , 2011 .

[28]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Situated learning, instructional technology, and attitude change , 1995 .

[29]  J. Mezirow Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. , 1997 .

[30]  Lorraine Hudson,et al.  Smart Cities MOOC: Teaching citizens how to co-create smart cities , 2016 .

[31]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Moving Through MOOCS: Pedagogy, Learning Design and Patterns of Engagement , 2015, EC-TEL.

[32]  Laura M. Harrison,et al.  MOOCs and Democratic Education. , 2013 .

[33]  Philip G. Zimbardo,et al.  Influencing attitudes and changing behavior : a basic introduction to relevant methodology, theory, and applications , 1972 .

[34]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  Science Education For Citizenship Teaching Socio Scientific Issues , 2016 .

[35]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[36]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory , 1999 .

[37]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Research Trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Theses and Dissertations: Surfing the Tsunami Wave , 2016 .

[38]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Learning in MOOCs: A Comparison Study , 2016 .