ULTRA-SHARP Nonoscillatory Convection Schemes for High-Speed Steady Multidimensional Flow

SUMMARYFor convection-dominated flows, classical second-order methods are notoriouslyoscillatory and often unstable. For this reason, many computational-fluid-dynam-icists have adopted various forms of (inherently stable) first-order upwinding overthe past few decades. Although it is now well known that first-order convectionschemes suffer from serious inaccuracies attributable to artificial viscosity ornumerical diffusion under high-convection conditions, these methods continue toenjoy widespread popularity for numerical heat-transfer calculations, apparentlydue to a perceived lack of viable high-accuracy alternatives. But alternatives areavailable. For example, nonoscillatory methods used in gasdynamics, includingcurrently_opular "TVD" schemes, can be easily adapted to multidimensional incom-pressible 1low and convective transport. This, in itself, would be a major advance fornumerical convective heat transfer, for example. But, as this report shows, second-order TVD schemes form only a small, overly restrictive, subclass of a much moreuniversal, and extremely simple, nonoscillatory flux-limiting strategy which can beapplied to convection schemes of arbitrarily high-order accuracy, while requiringonly a simple tridiagonal ADI line-solver, as used in the majority of general-purposeiterative codes for incompressible flow and numerical heat transfer. The new uni-versal limiter and associated solution procedures form the so-called ULTRA-SHARPalternative for high-resolution nonoscillatory multidimensional steady-state high-speed convective modelling.INTROI) UCTIONFor many years the state of the art in high-speed convective modelling, espe-cially in the field of numerical heat and mass transfer, has been dominated by first-order upwinding, often in the guise of the "Hybrid" scheme of Spalding [1] or, morerecently, the related "Power-Law Differencing Scheme" (PLDS) of Patankar [2].This situation has clearly evolved from an attempt to remedy the infamous problemsof unphysical oscillations and instabilities associated with "classical" central-differ-ence methods under high-convection conditions, using practical grids. The Hybridscheme avoids oscillatory behaviour by switching from second-order central to first-order upwinding for convection (and omitting modelled physical diffusion) whereverthe local component grid Peclet (or Reynolds) number exceeds a value of 2. PLDSand the exponential differencing scheme (EDS) on which it is based [3] involve amore subtle blending strategy, but both are also equivalent to first-order upwindingfor convection (with physical diffusion totally suppressed) for component grid PecletWork funded by Space Act Agreement C-99066-G.

[1]  I. Bohachevsky,et al.  Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics , 1959 .

[2]  P. Lax,et al.  Difference schemes for hyperbolic equations with high order of accuracy , 1964 .

[3]  J. Fromm A method for reducing dispersion in convective difference schemes , 1968 .

[4]  R. Maccormack The Effect of Viscosity in Hypervelocity Impact Cratering , 1969 .

[5]  D. Spalding A novel finite difference formulation for differential expressions involving both first and second derivatives , 1972 .

[6]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme , 1974 .

[7]  G. D. Raithby,et al.  A critical evaluation of upstream differencing applied to problems involving fluid flow , 1976 .

[8]  R. F. Warming,et al.  Upwind Second-Order Difference Schemes and Applications in Aerodynamic Flows , 1976 .

[9]  G. de Vahl Davis,et al.  An evaluation of upwind and central difference approximations by a study of recirculating flow , 1976 .

[10]  G. D. Raithby,et al.  Skew upstream differencing schemes for problems involving fluid flow , 1976 .

[11]  B. P. Leonard A consistency check for estimating truncation error due to upstream differencing , 1978 .

[12]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Practical evaluation of three finite difference schemes for the computation of steady-state recirculating flows , 1980 .

[13]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Calculation of Annular and Twin Parallel Jets Using Various Discretization Schemes and Turbulence-Model Variations , 1981 .

[14]  E. Bender Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Von S. V. Patankar. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington – New York – London. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York 1980. 1. Aufl., 197 S., 76 Abb., geb., DM 71,90 , 1981 .

[15]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Three-dimensional lid-driven cavity flow: experiment and simulation , 1983 .

[16]  P. Sweby High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1984 .

[17]  A. Turan Improved numerical methods for turbulent viscous recirculating flows , 1985 .

[18]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Discretization of nonlinear convection processes: A broad-range comparison of four schemes , 1985 .

[19]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  Assessment of discretization schemes to reduce numerical diffusion in the calculation of complex flows , 1985 .

[20]  P. Roe CHARACTERISTIC-BASED SCHEMES FOR THE EULER EQUATIONS , 1986 .

[21]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Euler calculations for a complete aircraft , 1986 .

[22]  Nonlinear transient phenomena in a three-dimensional cavity flow: A numerical investigation , 1986 .

[23]  H. C. Yee Upwind and Symmetric Shock-Capturing Schemes , 1987 .

[24]  Numerical methods in thermal problems (vol5 , part1) , 1987 .

[25]  I. P. Castro,et al.  Studies in numerical computations of recirculating flows , 1987 .

[26]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  Simple high-accuracy resolution program for convective modelling of discontinuities , 1988 .

[27]  B. P. Leonard Universal Limiter for Transient Interpolation Modeling of the Advective Transport Equations : The ULTIMATE Conservative Difference Scheme , 1988 .

[28]  J. Zhu,et al.  A local oscillation-damping algorithm for higher-order convection schemes , 1988 .

[29]  P. Gaskell,et al.  Curvature‐compensated convective transport: SMART, A new boundedness‐ preserving transport algorithm , 1988 .

[30]  D. Bradley,et al.  A Taylor-series approach to numerical accuracy and a third-order scheme for strong convective flows , 1988 .

[31]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Three‐dimensional unsteady flow simulations: Alternative strategies for a volume‐averaged calculation , 1989 .

[32]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Computation of three-dimensional turbulent flow in non-orthogonal junctions by abranch-coupling method , 1989 .

[33]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[34]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  Sharp monotonic resolution of discontinuities without clipping of narrow extrema , 1991 .