Micro-CT-based screening of biomechanical and structural properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds

The development of successful scaffolds for bone tissue engineering requires a concurrent engineering approach that combines different research fields. In order to limit in vivo experiments and reduce trial and error research, a scaffold screening technique has been developed. In this protocol seven structural and three biomechanical properties of potential scaffold materials are quantified and compared to the desired values. The property assessment is done on computer models of the scaffolds, and these models are based on micro-CT images. As a proof of principle, three porous scaffolds were evaluated with this protocol: stainless steel, hydroxyapatite, and titanium. These examples demonstrate that the modelling technique is able to quantify important scaffold properties. Thus, a powerful technique for automated screening of bone tissue engineering scaffolds has been developed that in a later stage may be used to tailor the scaffold properties to specific requirements.

[1]  Robert Langer,et al.  Tissue engineering: the design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation , 1999, The Lancet.

[2]  L. Bonassar,et al.  Direct perfusion measurements of cancellous bone anisotropic permeability. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[4]  J. Schrooten,et al.  Trabecular bone scaffolding using a biomimetic approach , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[5]  S. Cowin.  Bone mechanics handbook , 2001 .

[6]  E. Sachlos,et al.  Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2003, European cells & materials.

[7]  M. O. Hellera,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing , 2001 .

[8]  Ignace Verpoest,et al.  Pore network modeling of permeability for textile reinforcements , 2003 .

[9]  D. Jones,et al.  Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[10]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Ming Ding,et al.  Age‐related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  D Kaspar,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone: effects of mechanical strain on osteoblastic cells in type I collagen matrices. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[13]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone Mechanics Handbook, 2nd Edition. - , 2003 .

[14]  B S Myers,et al.  An improved method for finite element mesh generation of geometrically complex structures with application to the skullbase. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Tim Van Cleynenbreugel.  Porous Scaffolds for the Replacement of Large Bone Defects: A Biomechanical Design Study (Poreuze draagstructuren voor de vervanging van botweefsel: een biomechanische ontwerpstudie) , 2005 .

[16]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[17]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[18]  M. Lafage-Proust,et al.  Physiological strains remodel extracellular matrix and cell-cell adhesion in osteoblastic cells cultured on alumina-coated titanium alloy. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[19]  D. Ingber,et al.  Prevascularization of porous biodegradable polymers , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[21]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Amit Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Pore size and pore volume effects on alumina and TCP ceramic scaffolds , 2003 .

[23]  Antonios G Mikos,et al.  Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[24]  Xuejian Liu,et al.  Novel Method To Optimize the Structure of Reticulated Porous Ceramics , 2004 .

[25]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  P. Christel,et al.  Comparison of coral resorption and bone apposition with two natural corals of different porosities. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[27]  C. Turner,et al.  Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain , 1995, Calcified Tissue International.

[28]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[29]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. , 1993, Bone.

[30]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  F. S. Ortega,et al.  Properties of Highly Porous Hydroxyapatite Obtained by the Gelcasting of Foams , 2000 .