Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints

The objective of the study was, with multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method, to determine whether bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US), but not with radiography, represent true erosive changes. We included 17 RA patients with at least one, previously detected, radiographically invisible MCP joint MRI erosion, and four healthy control individuals. They all underwent CT, MRI, US and radiography of the 2nd to 5th MCP joints of one hand on the same day. Each imaging modality was evaluated for the presence of bone erosions in each MCP joint quadrant. In total, 336 quadrants were examined. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, respectively, for detecting bone erosions (with CT as the reference method) were 19%, 100% and 81% for radiography; 68%, 96% and 89% for MRI; and 42%, 91% and 80% for US. When the 16 quadrants with radiographic erosions were excluded from the analysis, similar values for MRI (65%, 96% and 90%) and US (30%, 92% and 80%) were obtained. CT and MRI detected at least one erosion in all patients but none in control individuals. US detected at least one erosion in 15 patients, however, erosion-like changes were seen on US in all control individuals. Nine patients had no erosions on radiography. In conclusion, with CT as the reference method, MRI and US exhibited high specificities (96% and 91%, respectively) in detecting bone erosions in RA MCP joints, even in the radiographically non-erosive joints (96% and 92%). The moderate sensitivities indicate that even more erosions than are seen on MRI and, particularly, US are present. Radiography exhibited high specificity (100%) but low sensitivity (19%). The present study strongly indicates that bone erosions, detected with MRI and US in RA patients, represent a loss of calcified tissue with cortical destruction, and therefore can be considered true bone erosions.

[1]  T. Möttönen,et al.  Prediction of erosiveness and rate of development of new erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  S. Sarna,et al.  Prognosis of inflammatory joint diseases. A three-year follow-up study. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[3]  M. Ward,et al.  Clinical measures in rheumatoid arthritis: which are most useful in assessing patients? , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  F. McQueen,et al.  Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  James Woodburn,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a more precise image or just a more expensive one? , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  O. Tervonen,et al.  Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[8]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Low field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in untreated rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective followup of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  Koen Vos,et al.  How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: a prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  Paul Bird,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  F. Nørgaard.  EARLIEST ROENTGENOLOGICAL CHANGES IN POLYARTHRITIS OF THE RHEUMATOID TYPE: RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. , 1965, Radiology.

[15]  Tore K Kvien,et al.  Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Ultrasonography: a valid method for assessing rheumatoid arthritis? , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  R. Yood,et al.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  U. Mödder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and miniarthroscopy of metacarpophalangeal joints: sensitive detection of morphologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  F. McQueen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  M. Ostergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis , 2000, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

[23]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: comparison with the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the synovium. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[25]  Ward Mm.  Clinical measures in rheumatoid arthritis: which are most useful in assessing patients? , 1994 .

[26]  D. van der Heijde,et al.  Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, British journal of rheumatology.

[27]  Henrik S. Thomsen,et al.  MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions , 2002, European Radiology.

[28]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  K. Kaarela.  Prognostic factors and diagnostic criteria in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[30]  G. Newsome.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 update. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[31]  angesichts der Corona-Pandemie,et al.  UPDATE , 1973, The Lancet.

[32]  H. Bliddal,et al.  Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of synovial inflammation of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[33]  Michael J. Green,et al.  Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[34]  W. Schmidt.  Doppler sonography in rheumatology. , 2004, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[35]  N Stewart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[36]  Bernard Cortet,et al.  Metacarpophalangeal joints at US in asymptomatic volunteers and cadaveric specimens. , 2004, Radiology.

[37]  M. Sasa,et al.  A Three-year Follow-up Study , 1981 .

[38]  Neal Stewart,et al.  Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.