A Usage-Based Model of Early Grammatical Development

The representations and processes yielding the limited length and telegraphic style of language production early on in acquisition have received little attention in acquisitional modeling. In this paper, we present a model, starting with minimal linguistic representations, that incrementally builds up an inventory of increasingly long and abstract grammatical representations (form+meaning pairings), in line with the usage-based conception of language acquisition. We explore its performance on a comprehension and a generation task, showing that, over time, the model better understands the processed utterances, generates longer utterances, and better expresses the situation these utterances intend to refer to.

[1]  J. Pine,et al.  Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors , 2012, Cognition.

[2]  Mark Steedman,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Syntactic and Semantic Acquisition from Child-Directed Utterances and their Meanings , 2012, EACL.

[3]  A. Alishahi,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Language and Cognitive Processes a Computational Model of Learning Semantic Roles from Child-directed Language a Computational Model of Learning Semantic Roles from Child-directed Language , 2022 .

[4]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Modeling children's early grammatical knowledge , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  A Computational Model of Early Argument Structure Acquisition , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[7]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[9]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[10]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[11]  M. Braine Children's First Word Combinations. , 1976 .

[12]  J. Pine,et al.  Explaining Quantitative Variation in the Rate of Optional Infinitive Errors across Languages: a Comparison of Mosaic and the Variational Learning Model* , 2009 .

[13]  A. Verhagen The conception of constructions as complex signs: Emergence of structure and reduction to usage , 2009 .

[14]  R. Langacker A dynamic view of usage and language acquisition , 2009 .

[15]  A. Goldberg The nature of generalization in language , 2009 .

[16]  Nancy Chang,et al.  A computational model of the emergence of early constructions , 2008 .

[17]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[18]  J. Pine Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition , 2005 .

[19]  Paul Kay,et al.  An Informal Sketch of a Formal Architecture for Construction Grammar , 2002, Grammars.

[20]  M. Tomasello Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life , 2000 .

[21]  Victor H. Yngve,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar volume I. Theoretical prerequisites: By Ronald W. Langacker. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987, xii + 516pp , 1989 .

[22]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .