Price and Service Discrimination in Queueing Systems: Incentive-Compatibility of Gcμ Scheduling

This article studies the optimal prices and service quality grades that a queuing system --- the "firm” --- provides to heterogeneous, utility-maximizing customers who measure quality by their experienced delay distributions. Results are threefold: First, delay cost curves are introduced that allow for a flexible description of a customer’s quality sensitivity. Second, a comprehensive executable approach is proposed that analytically specifies scheduling, delay distributions and prices for arbitrary delay sensitivity curves. The tractability of this approach derives from porting heavy-traffic Brownian results into the economic analysis. The generalized cμ (Gcμ) scheduling rule that emerges is dynamic so that, in general, service grades need not correspond to a static priority ranking. A benchmarking example investigates the value of differentiated service. Third, the notions of grade and rate incentive compatibility (IC) are introduced to study this system under asymmetric information and are established for Gcμ scheduling when service times are homogeneous and customers atomistic. Grade IC induces correct grade choice resulting in perfect service discrimination; rate IC additionally induces centralized-optimal rates. Dynamic Gcμ scheduling exhibits negative feedback that, together with time-dependent pricing, can also yield rate incentive compatibility with heterogeneous service times. Finally, multiplan pricing, which offers all customers a menu with a choice of multiple rate plans, is analyzed.

[1]  Phillip J. Lederer,et al.  Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition , 1997, Oper. Res..

[2]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Service Competition, Outsourcing and Co-Production in a Queuing Game , 1999 .

[3]  Y. Masuda,et al.  Dynamic Pricing for Network Service: Equilibrium and Stability , 1999 .

[4]  Richard M. Bradford Pricing, routing, and incentive compatibility in multiserver queues , 1996 .

[5]  Hayriye Ayhan,et al.  Scheduling of Multi-Class Single-Server Queues Under Nontraditional Performance Measures , 2000, Oper. Res..

[6]  P. Naor The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls , 1969 .

[7]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Incentive-Compatible Pricing for a Service Facility with Joint Production and Congestion Externalities , 1998 .

[8]  Francis T. Lui,et al.  An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Pricing computer services: queueing effects , 1985, CACM.

[10]  M. Reiman The Heavy Traffic Diffusion Approximation for Sojourn Times in Jackson Networks , 1982 .

[11]  C. Loch Pricing in markets sensitive to delay , 1991 .

[12]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[13]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Optimal Incentive-Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue , 1990, Oper. Res..

[14]  R. Dolan Incentive mechanisms for priority queuing problems , 1978 .

[15]  J. V. Mieghem Dynamic Scheduling with Convex Delay Costs: The Generalized CU Rule , 1995 .

[16]  Martin P. Loeb,et al.  INCENTIVES AND PUBLIC INPUTS , 1975 .

[17]  Shaler Stidham,et al.  Individual versus Social Optimization in Exponential Congestion Systems , 1977, Oper. Res..

[18]  Tito Conti,et al.  The economics of quality , 1993 .

[19]  D. Reitman Endogenous Quality Differentiation in Congested Markets , 1991 .

[20]  Niels Chr. Knudsen Individual and Social Optimization in a Multiserver Queue with a General Cost-Benefit Structure , 1972 .

[21]  Richard J. Gibbens,et al.  Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control , 1999, at - Automatisierungstechnik.

[22]  S. Rao,et al.  Optimal Pricing of Priority Services , 1998, Oper. Res..