To What Extent do the Findings of Laboratory-Based Spatial Attention Research Apply to the Real-World Setting of Driving?

This paper provides a critical review of laboratory-based studies of spatial attention. We highlight a number of ways in which such studies fail to capture the key factors/constraints that have been shown to give rise to an increased risk of vehicular accident in real-world situations. In particular, limitations that are related to the design of the attentional capture task itself and limitations that are concern the demographic and current state of the participants tested in these laboratory studies are discussed. A list of recommendations are made concerning those areas in which laboratory-based spatial attention research could focus on in the future in order to make sure that their results are more relevant to those working in an applied setting, and thus, enhance translational research.

[1]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies , 2005 .

[2]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[3]  W. G. Davenport,et al.  Vigilance and arousal: effects of different types of background stimulation. , 1972, The Journal of psychology.

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Listen out! Behavioural and subjective responses to verbal warnings , 2012 .

[6]  Davenport Wg Vigilance for simultaneous auditory and cutaneous signals. , 1969 .

[7]  Paul Atchley,et al.  Cellular phone use while driving: A methodological checklist for investigating dual-task costs , 2008 .

[8]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Donald N. Buckner,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCES ON SINGLE AND DUAL SENSORY MODE VIGILANCE TASKS , 1961 .

[10]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  A. Craig,et al.  A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[12]  Morten L Kringelbach,et al.  Listening to infant distress vocalizations enhances effortful motor performance , 2012, Acta paediatrica.

[13]  Theodore Alexopoulos,et al.  I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli , 2012 .

[14]  J R WARE,et al.  Vigilance: a comparison in auditory, visual, and combined audio-visual tasks. , 1962, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  A. Fort,et al.  Inattention behind the wheel: how factual internal thoughts impact attentional control while driving , 2014 .

[16]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[17]  Don R Lyon,et al.  Time Course of Location-Cuing Effects With a Probability Manipulation. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[18]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention , 2004 .

[19]  Charles Spence,et al.  Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  C. Spence,et al.  Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  VIGILANCE IN COMPLEX TASK SITUATIONS. , 1964, The Journal of psychology.

[22]  Russell L. Smith,et al.  Vigilance Research: Its Application To Industrial Problems1 , 1969 .

[23]  C W Fontaine,et al.  Effects of Familiarity of Music on Vigilant Performance , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  Dot Hs,et al.  The Impact of Hand-Held And Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk , 2013 .

[25]  Charles Spence,et al.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Using Peripersonal Warning Signals to Orient a Driver’s Gaze , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Christopher M. Janelle,et al.  Anxiety and Performance: A Visual Search Examination of the Processing Efficiency Theory , 2003 .

[28]  Robert A. Baker,et al.  Vigilance performance under conditions of redundant and nonredundant signal presentation. , 1963 .

[29]  Christopher B. Mayhorn,et al.  Multimodal Cueing: The Relative Benefits of the Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Channels in Complex Environments , 2012 .

[30]  Warren Brodsky,et al.  Background music as a risk factor for distraction among young-novice drivers. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Samuel G Charlton,et al.  Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  W G Davenport Vigilance for simultaneous auditory and cutaneous signals. , 1969, Canadian journal of psychology.

[33]  Michael J Kallan,et al.  Peer passengers: how do they affect teen crashes? , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[34]  André Charles,et al.  Fatigue, sleepiness, and performance in simulated versus real driving conditions. , 2005, Sleep.

[35]  Linda Angell,et al.  The Distracted Driver: Mechanisms, Models, and Measurement , 2011 .

[36]  R. Klein,et al.  Effects of arousal on human visual dominance , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Murray Mm,et al.  The Colavita Visual Dominance Effect -- The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes , 2012 .

[38]  Susana Rubio,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and Workload Profile Methods , 2004 .

[39]  Lars Eriksson,et al.  Enhanced Perception and Performance by Multimodal Threat Cueing in Simulated Combat Vehicle , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[40]  U. Polat,et al.  Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Marple-Horvat,et al.  The role of effort in moderating the anxiety – performance relationship: Testing the prediction of processing efficiency theory in simulated rally driving , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[42]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  A F Williams,et al.  The effect of teenage passengers on the fatal crash risk of teenage drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[44]  Warren Brodsky,et al.  The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control , 2001 .

[45]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  M. Sivak The Information That Drivers Use: Is it Indeed 90% Visual? , 1996, Perception.

[47]  M. Wallace,et al.  Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[48]  C. B. Colby The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[49]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[50]  Denis McKeown,et al.  Mapping Candidate Within-Vehicle Auditory Displays to Their Referents , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[51]  Frederick D. Gregory,et al.  Multisensory Information Processing for Enhanced Human-Machine Symbiosis , 2015, HCI.

[52]  C. Spence Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[53]  J. Henrich,et al.  The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  Herbert J. Oyer,et al.  RESPONSE OF POPULATION TO OPTIMUM WARNING SIGNAL. , 1963 .

[55]  Rachel N. Carey,et al.  The Impact of Threat Appeals on Fear Arousal and Driver Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research 1990–2011 , 2013, PloS one.

[56]  C. Spence,et al.  Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Effects of mental fatigue on attention: an ERP study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  C Spence,et al.  Multisensory interface design for drivers: past, present and future , 2008, Ergonomics.

[59]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[60]  I D Brown,et al.  Measurement of control skills, vigilance, and performance on a subsidiary task during 12 hours of car driving. , 1967, Ergonomics.

[61]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  The Bankruptcy of Everyday Memory , 1989 .

[62]  L. Gugerty Situation Awareness During Driving: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Dynamic Spatial Memory , 1997 .

[63]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[64]  P P Jovanis,et al.  Multiday driving patterns and motor carrier accident risk: a disaggregate analysis. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[65]  Charles Spence,et al.  Drive safely with neuroergonomics , 2012 .

[66]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. , 2007, Emotion.

[68]  Charles Spence,et al.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli? , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[69]  E Fox,et al.  Attentional bias in anxiety: selective or not? , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[70]  T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of arousal on attention to central and peripheral visual stimuli. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[71]  Sherrilene Classen,et al.  Comparison of Driving Errors Between On-the-Road and Simulated Driving Assessment: A Validation Study , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[72]  Chris S Dula,et al.  Differing types of cellular phone conversations and dangerous driving. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[73]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  AttentionFrom Theory to Practice , 2006 .

[74]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes , 2005 .

[75]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[76]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[77]  Haluk Ogmen,et al.  Metacontrast masking and attention do not interact , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[78]  Charles Spence,et al.  Response Requirements Modulate Tactile Spatial Congruency Evects for Example, given That the Body Can Adopt a Variety of Diverent Postures, a Tactile Sensation Arising , 2022 .

[79]  H. Beh,et al.  Performance on driving-related tasks during music , 1999 .

[80]  M. Just,et al.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak , 2008, Brain Research.

[81]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory warning signals: when spatial correspondence matters , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[82]  C. Spence Crossmodal spatial attention , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[83]  G. Andersen,et al.  Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion. , 2013, Psychology and aging.

[84]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Driving Simulator Validity: Some Considerations , 1996 .

[85]  K. Fagerström,et al.  Effects of Listening to Car Radio, Experience, and Personality of the Driver on Subsidiary Reaction Time and Heart Rate in a Long-term Driving Task , 1977 .