Attribution of Causality to Common and Distinctive Elements of Compound Stimuli
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Ward. Theory of Attention. , 1918 .
[2] H. M. Jenkins,et al. The display of information and the judgment of contingency. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.
[3] P. Nidditch,et al. Enquiries: Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals , 1966 .
[4] K. Haberlandt,et al. Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.
[5] David Hume. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .
[6] R. Rescorla,et al. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .
[7] E. Wasserman. STIMULUS-REINFORCER PREDICTIVENESS AND SELECTIVE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN PIGEONS ' , 1974 .
[8] N. Mackintosh. A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .
[9] W. Kintsch,et al. Memory and cognition , 1977 .
[10] L. J. Hammond. The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[11] B. Fischhoff,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .
[12] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. Perception of causal relations in humans: Factors affecting judgments of response-outcome contingencies under free-operant procedures☆ , 1983 .
[13] G. Thomas. Contiguity and contingency in instrumental conditioning , 1983 .
[14] L. Alloy,et al. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: the joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. , 1984, Psychological review.
[15] L. Alloy,et al. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. , 1984 .
[16] E A Wasserman,et al. Judging response-outcome relations: The role of response-outcome contingency, outcome probability, and method of information presentation , 1984, Memory & cognition.
[17] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. Response-outcome contingency: Behavioral and judgmental effects of appetitive and aversive outcomes with college students , 1985 .
[18] R. Hogarth,et al. Judging probable cause. , 1986 .
[19] E. Wasserman,et al. College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[20] D. Hilton,et al. Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .
[21] E. Wasserman,et al. Judging interevent contingencies: Being right for the wrong reasons , 1986 .
[22] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. The effects of unidirectional versus bidirectional rating procedures on college students' judgments of response-outcome contingency , 1986 .
[23] A. Dickinson,et al. Associative Accounts of Causality Judgment , 1988 .
[24] G. Bower,et al. From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[25] K. Holyoak,et al. A Theory of Conditioning: Inductive Learning within Rule-Based Default Hierarchies. , 1989 .
[26] E. Wasserman. Detecting Response-Outcome Relations: Toward an Understanding of the Causal Texture of the Environment , 1990 .
[27] E A Wasserman,et al. Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.