Encouraging physical therapy compliance with a hands-Off mobile robot

This paper presents results toward our ongoing research program into hands-off assistive human-robot interaction [6]. Our work has focused on applications of socially assistive robotics in health care and education, where human supervision can be significantly augmented and complemented by intelligent machines. In this paper, we focus on the role of embodiment, empirically addressing the question: "In what ways can the robot's physical embodiment be used effectively to positively influence human task-related behavior?" We hypothesized that users' personalities would correlate with their preferences of robot behavior expression. To test this hypothesis, we implemented an autonomous mobile robot aimed at the role of a monitoring and encouragement system for stroke patient rehabilitation. We performed a pilot study that indicates that the presence and behavior of the robot can influence how well people comply with their physical therapy.

[1]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[2]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[3]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  W. Rymer,et al.  Comparison of Robot-Assisted Reaching to Free Reaching in Promoting Recovery From Chronic Stroke , 2001 .

[6]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Web-Based Telerehabilitation for the Upper , 2002 .

[7]  S. Wolf,et al.  Repetitive Task Practice: A Critical Review of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke , 2002, The neurologist.

[8]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Sociable robots : the role of presence and task in human-robot interaction , 2003 .

[9]  Jane Webster,et al.  Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  C. Winstein,et al.  A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  C. Bartneck,et al.  In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions , 2004 .

[12]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Motion capture from inertial sensing for untethered humanoid teleoperation , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..

[13]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  M.J. Mataric,et al.  Hands-off assistive robotics for post-stroke arm rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[15]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[16]  M. Matarić,et al.  A hands-off physical therapy assistance robot for cardiac patients , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..