Frequency and neighborhood effects on auditory perception of drug names in noise

Drug name confusions occur when drugs whose names look or sound alike (e.g., Celebrex/Cerebyx) are confused by clinicians and patients. Our project examines effects of frequency and similarity on auditory perception of drug names. Luce’s Neighborhood Activation Model is the theoretical framework. Frequency information was taken from national prescribing frequency databases. Spoken drug names were transcribed to ARPAbet. Similarity neighborhoods were calculated based on phoneme edit distance using phoneme‐to‐phoneme confusion probabilities as substitution costs. The confusability of each name was estimated using Luce’s frequency‐weighted neighborhood probability rule (FWNPR). One hundred brand and one hundred generic drug names, stratified by FWNPR, were recorded. Low and high frequency sounds were filtered out to mimic telephone bandwidth. Names were used as stimuli in a perceptual identification experiment. Participants heard the drug names, at three different signal‐to‐noise ratios, against a background...

[1]  B. Lambert,et al.  Frequency estimates from prescription drug datasets (revision of #04‐11‐066A) , 2006, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[2]  Prahlad Gupta,et al.  Effects of frequency and similarity neighborhoods on pharmacists' visual perception of drug names. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[3]  E. Flynn,et al.  National observational study of prescription dispensing accuracy and safety in 50 pharmacies. , 2003, Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association.

[4]  Jeff Rodman,et al.  The Effect of Bandwidth on Speech Intelligibility , 2003 .

[5]  B L Lambert,et al.  Effect of orthographic and phonological similarity on false recognition of drug names. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Bruce L. Lambert,et al.  Descriptive Analysis of the Drug Name Lexicon , 2001 .

[7]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[8]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[9]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .

[11]  B L Lambert,et al.  Similarity as a risk factor in drug-name confusion errors: the look-alike (orthographic) and sound-alike (phonetic) model. , 1999, Medical care.

[12]  N. Davis.  Drug Names that Look and Sound Alike , 1999 .

[13]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Putting frequencies in the dictionary , 1997 .

[15]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[16]  C. C. Fraterrigo,et al.  The "Z" word. , 1994, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[17]  Jonathan G. Fiscus,et al.  Better alignment procedures for speech recognition evaluation , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[18]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .

[19]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[22]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[23]  H. Savin.  Word‐Frequency Effect and Errors in the Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[24]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[25]  R. Solomon,et al.  Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.