Children's and adults' schemes in categorization of basic objects and mobile applications

Diversity of users has become recent design concerns, and children are one of those user groups. Organization of contents is one of research areas in designing for children. Research suggests differences in abilities between adults and children; for instance, attention, logic and memory skills, and linguistic abilities. This is related to the way children navigate and access information. Efficient system organization must correspond with user's categorization scheme. Prior study suggests differences in the way children categorized objects than the predetermined categories; however, it did not provide a comparison between children and adults in the way they generated the categories. Moreover, influence of expertise on categorization schemes has been highlighted in psychological literature. Primary objective of this study was to investigate how children and adults utilize categorization schemes based on their domain expertise. This study was carried out under two different circumstances: 1) when the objects were concrete and both age groups were domain experts, and 2) when objects were more abstract and both age groups could be either novices or experts. Similarity and differences between adults and children were found. The results of both tasks showed indicated that categorization schemes employed by participants depends on the information they were exposed to.

[1]  Louis B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Information architecture for the world wide web - designing large-scale web sites , 1998 .

[2]  Sally Fincher,et al.  Making sense of card sorting data , 2005, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[3]  Jihee Beak.  Children's perceptual cognitive factors in book selection and metadata schema: Pilot study , 2012, ASIST.

[4]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[6]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Using children's developmental psychology to guide augmented-reality design and usability , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[7]  A. Gopnik,et al.  A shift in children’s use of perceptual and causal cues to categorization , 2000 .

[8]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Cognition: Theory and Applications , 1982 .

[9]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  How children search the internet with keyword interfaces , 2009, IDC.

[10]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Using an open card sort with children to categorize games in a mobile phone application store , 2013, CHI.

[11]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  How Inferences about Novel Domain-Related Concepts Can Be Constrained by Structured Knowledge. , 1989 .

[12]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Child computer interaction , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  T. Wilcox.  Object individuation: infants’ use of shape, size, pattern, and color , 1999, Cognition.

[14]  Kara Reuter,et al.  Children ’ s acquisition of categories and the implications for research in the development of classification schemes , 2006 .

[15]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Age Differences in Product Categorization , 1990 .

[16]  Paula Kotzé,et al.  Ten design lessons from the literature on child development and children's use of technology , 2009, IDC.