What Is New in the New TOEFL-iBT 2006 Test Format?

In recent years TOEFL has become one of the most popular high-stakes tests affecting not only what and how English language teachers teach but also what and how students learn (e.g. Johnson, Jordan, & Poehner, 2005; Alderson & Wall, 1993). The new 2006 TOEFL–iBT exam is on its way; yet, until now, information about the new test format and test preparation materials is scarce. Above and beyond interest in the test alone, the burning question is what demanded the revision of the current test, given that the latest computer-based TOEFL was introduced fairly recently worldwide. The paper elaborates on some of the major reasons that have promoted the current changes of the exam format emphasizing the realization of testing experts, researchers, ESL/EFL teachers, students, program administrators, and other end-users that to succeed in an academic environment in which English is the language of instruction, students need not only to understand English, but also to communicate effectively. Among these reasons is the growing awareness among all parties interested in the test results that if a test is aiming to be a test of English for academic purposes and a reliable instrument of language proficiency, it needs to capture the integrated nature of the use of skills in academic settings. The paper also discusses in greater detail the new revisions of the test format – that is, the inclusion of a new speaking section, the revision of the writing component, and the incorporation of notetaking throughout all sections of the test – in light of the theoretical considerations and research findings underpinning the modifications. The expected outcomes and implications of the test revisions are outlined with regard to a focus on communicative competence and the anticipated positive washback effect on the way English is taught in the future.

[1]  Lyle F. Bachman.  语言测试要略 = Fundamental considerations in language testing , 1990 .

[2]  L. Chen.  Washback of A Public Exam on English Teaching. , 2002 .

[3]  A. Davies.  Three heresies of language testing research , 2003 .

[4]  Sybil B. Carlson,et al.  SURVEY OF ACADEMIC WRITING TASKS REQUIRED OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE FOREIGN STUDENTS , 1983 .

[5]  Karl J. Krahnke,et al.  Student Perceptions of Academic Language Study , 1986 .

[6]  Yoshinori Watanabe,et al.  Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research , 1996 .

[7]  S. Andrews,et al.  Targeting washback—a case-study , 2002 .

[8]  Samuel Messick.  Validity and washback in language testing , 1996 .

[9]  M. Benson.  University ESL reading: A content analysis , 1991 .

[10]  P. V. Meter,et al.  College Students' Theory of Note-Taking Derived From Their Perceptions of Note-Taking , 1994 .

[11]  April Ginther,et al.  A review of the academic needs of native English-speaking college students in the United States , 1996 .

[12]  J. Charles Alderson,et al.  Does Washback Exist , 1993 .

[13]  Richard J. Tannenbaum,et al.  Dependability of Scores for a New ESL Speaking Test : Evaluating Prototype Tasks , .

[14]  Thomas H. Huckin,et al.  Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension , 1990 .

[15]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  语言测试实践 = Language testing in practice , 1998 .

[16]  Janna Fox.  Test decisions over time: tracking validity , 2004 .

[17]  Andy Curtis,et al.  Washback or Backwash: A Review of the Impact of Testing on Teaching and Learning. , 2000 .

[18]  Bonny Norton Peirce.  Demystifying the TOEFL® Reading Test , 1992 .

[19]  J. Hartley,et al.  Note‐taking: A critical review , 1978 .

[20]  J. Charles Alderson,et al.  TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback , 1996 .

[21]  C. Berkenkotter,et al.  Rethinking Genre from a Sociocognitive Perspective , 1993 .

[22]  Qi Luxia.  Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test , 2005 .

[23]  John Read.  Providing Relevant Content in an EAP Writing Test. , 1990 .

[24]  Averil Coxhead.  A New Academic Word List , 2000 .

[25]  Tom Lumley,et al.  Conflicting perspectives on the role of test preparation in relation to learning , 2000 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Bailey,et al.  Washback in language testing , 1999 .

[27]  Joan E. Cutting.  The grammar of the in-group code , 1999 .

[28]  Graham Gibbs.  Teaching Students to Learn , 1981 .

[29]  Brian K. Lynch,et al.  Investigating variability in tasks and rater judgements in a performance test of foreign language speaking , 1995 .

[30]  Marjorie Bingham Wesche,et al.  Second language performance testing: the Ontario Test of ESL as an example , 1987 .

[31]  J. Carson,et al.  Students' Perceptions of EAP Writing Instruction and Writing Needs Across the Disciplines , 1994 .

[32]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Validation of Performance-Based Assessments , 2000 .

[33]  Karen E. Johnson,et al.  The TOEFL Trump Card: An Investigation of Test Impact in an ESL Classroom , 2005 .

[34]  Yong-Won Lee,et al.  DEPENDABILITY OF NEW ESL WRITING TEST SCORES: EVALUATING PROTOTYPE TASKS AND ALTERNATIVE RATING SCHEMES , 2005 .

[35]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  EXAMINING EXPERT JUDGMENTS OF TASK DIFFICULTY ON ESSAY TESTS , 1994 .

[36]  Liying Cheng.  Impact of a Public English Examination Change on Students' Perceptions and Attitudes toward Their English Learning. , 1998 .

[37]  L. Hamp-Lyons.  Ethical Test Preparation Practice: The Case of the TOEFL , 1998 .

[38]  Discourse strategies for foreign business students: Preliminary research findings , 1987 .

[39]  Patricia Dunkel,et al.  The Effects of Notetaking, Lecture Length and Topic on the Listening Component of TOEFL 2000 , 2002 .

[40]  Patricia Dunkel,et al.  The Content of L1 and L2 Students' Lecture Notes and Its Relation to Test Performance. , 1988 .

[41]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  TOEFL 2000 : writing : composition, community, and assessment , 1997 .

[42]  M. Spratt.  Washback and the classroom: the implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams , 2005 .

[43]  Marilyn Binkley,et al.  Methodological Issues in Comparative Educational Studies: The Case of the IEA Reading Literacy Study. , 1995 .