Mutual nonlinear prediction as a tool to evaluate coupling strength and directionality in bivariate time series: comparison among different strategies based on k nearest neighbors.

We compare the different existing strategies of mutual nonlinear prediction regarding their ability to assess the coupling strength and directionality of the interactions in bivariate time series. Under the common framework of k -nearest neighbor local linear prediction, we test three approaches based on cross prediction, mixed prediction, and predictability improvement. The measures of interdependence provided by these approaches are first evaluated on short realizations of bivariate time series generated by coupled Henon models, investigating also the effects of noise. The usefulness of the three mutual nonlinear prediction schemes is then assessed in a common physiological application during known conditions of interaction-i.e., the analysis of the interdependence between heart rate and arterial pressure variability in healthy humans during supine resting and passive head-up tilting. Based on both simulation results and physiological interpretability of cardiovascular results, we conclude that cross prediction is valuable to quantify the coupling strength and predictability improvement to elicit directionality of the interactions in short and noisy bivariate time series.

[1]  N. Montano,et al.  Complexity and Nonlinearity in Short-Term Heart Period Variability: Comparison of Methods Based on Local Nonlinear Prediction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M. Rosenblum,et al.  Identification of coupling direction: application to cardiorespiratory interaction. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[4]  Theiler,et al.  Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[5]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  G. Rangarajan,et al.  Multiple Nonlinear Time Series with Extended Granger Causality , 2004 .

[7]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  Conditional entropy approach for the evaluation of the coupling strength , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  M Palus,et al.  Synchronization as adjustment of information rates: detection from bivariate time series. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  J. Martinerie,et al.  Nonlinear analyses of interictal EEG map the brain interdependences in human focal epilepsy , 1999 .

[10]  J. Martinerie,et al.  Nonlinear interdependencies of EEG signals in human intracranially recorded temporal lobe seizures , 1998, Brain Research.

[11]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Radial basis function approach to nonlinear Granger causality of time series. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  M. Paluš,et al.  Detecting nonlinearity and phase synchronization with surrogate data , 1998, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[13]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Nonlinear parametric model for Granger causality of time series , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Luca Faes,et al.  Evidence of unbalanced regulatory mechanism of heart rate and systolic pressure after acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[15]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Paluš,et al.  Directionality of coupling from bivariate time series: how to avoid false causalities and missed connections. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Farmer,et al.  Predicting chaotic time series. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[18]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[19]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[20]  Luca Faes,et al.  Mixed predictability and cross-validation to assess non-linear Granger causality in short cardiovascular variability series , 2006, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[21]  Luca Faes,et al.  Exploring directionality in spontaneous heart period and systolic pressure variability interactions in humans: implications in the evaluation of baroreflex gain. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[22]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  S. Malpas Neural influences on cardiovascular variability: possibilities and pitfalls. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  Ulrich Parlitz,et al.  Mixed State Analysis of multivariate Time Series , 2001, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[25]  Kurths,et al.  Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[26]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[27]  Theiler,et al.  Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[28]  R. Burke,et al.  Detecting dynamical interdependence and generalized synchrony through mutual prediction in a neural ensemble. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[29]  M. Rosenblum,et al.  Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Ramakrishna Mukkamala,et al.  System identification: a multi-signal approach for probing neural cardiovascular regulation , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[31]  Raffaello Furlan,et al.  Quantifying the strength of the linear causal coupling in closed loop interacting cardiovascular variability signals , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  P. Grassberger,et al.  A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intracranially recorded EEG , 1999, chao-dyn/9907013.

[33]  A. Malliani,et al.  Information domain analysis of cardiovascular variability signals: Evaluation of regularity, synchronisation and co-ordination , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[34]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[35]  Joydeep Bhattacharya,et al.  Effective detection of coupling in short and noisy bivariate data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[36]  Schmitz Measuring statistical dependence and coupling of subsystems , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[37]  Luca Faes,et al.  Bivariate nonlinear prediction to quantify the strength of complex dynamical interactions in short-term cardiovascular variability , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[38]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[39]  K. Hlavácková-Schindler,et al.  Causality detection based on information-theoretic approaches in time series analysis , 2007 .

[40]  R. Quiroga,et al.  Learning driver-response relationships from synchronization patterns. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[41]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[42]  Ernesto Pereda,et al.  Comparing generalized and phase synchronization in cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  J. Kurths,et al.  Heartbeat synchronized with ventilation , 1998, Nature.

[44]  Ute Feldmann,et al.  Predictability Improvement as an Asymmetrical Measure of Interdependence in bivariate Time Series , 2004, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[45]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Bivariate surrogate techniques: necessity, strengths, and caveats. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.