Transient spectral events in resting state MEG predict individual time-frequency task responses

Even in response to apparently simple tasks such as hand moving, human brain activity shows remarkable inter-subject variability. Presumably, this variability reflects genuine behavioural or functional variability. Recently, spatial variability of resting-state features in fMRI - specifically connectivity - has been shown to explain (spatial) task-response variability. Such a link, however, is still missing for M/EEG data and its spectrally rich structure. At the same time, it has recently been shown that task responses in M/EEG can be well represented using transient spectral events bursting at fast time scales. Here, we show that individual differences in the spatio-spectral structure of M/EEG task responses, can, to a reasonable degree, be predicted from individual differences in transient spectral events identified at rest. In a MEG dataset of diverse task conditions (including motor responses, working memory and language comprehension tasks) and resting-state sessions for each subject (n = 89), we used Hidden-Markov-Modelling to identify transient spectral events as a feature set to learn the mapping of space-time-frequency content from rest to task. Resulting trial-averaged, subject-specific task-response predictions were then compared with the actual task responses in left-out subjects. All task conditions were predicted significantly above chance. Furthermore, we observed a systematic relationship between genetic similarity (e.g. unrelated subjects vs. twins) and predictability. These findings support the idea that subject-specific transient spectral events in resting-state neural activity are linked to, and predictive of, subject-specific trial-averaged task responses in a wide range of experimental conditions.

[1]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts the amplitude of peri-saccadic mislocalization , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Saskia Haegens,et al.  Inter- and intra-individual variability in alpha peak frequency , 2014, NeuroImage.

[3]  O. Jensen,et al.  Asymmetric Amplitude Modulations of Brain Oscillations Generate Slow Evoked Responses , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance , 2016, Science.

[5]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Motor learning shapes temporal activity in human sensorimotor cortex , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[7]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Pineda The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing” , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[9]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Choice of multivariate autoregressive model order affecting real network functional connectivity estimate , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Nobre,et al.  Neural Oscillations: Sustained Rhythms or Transient Burst-Events? , 2018, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  W. Klimesch EEG-alpha rhythms and memory processes. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity , 2014, eLife.

[14]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[15]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[16]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[18]  C. Moore,et al.  The rate of transient beta frequency events predicts behavior across tasks and species , 2017, eLife.

[19]  M. Seghier,et al.  Interpreting and Utilising Intersubject Variability in Brain Function , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Influence of ongoing alpha rhythm on the visual evoked potential , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  Eleanor L. Barratt,et al.  Modulation of post‐movement beta rebound by contraction force and rate of force development , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[23]  P. Nunez,et al.  Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[24]  Biyu J. He Scale-free brain activity: past, present, and future , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Adding dynamics to the Human Connectome Project with MEG , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Steven Lemm,et al.  A novel mechanism for evoked responses in the human brain , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  W. Mcdonald,et al.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. , 1972, Lancet.

[28]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Suppressed alpha oscillations predict intelligibility of speech and its acoustic details. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Left temporal alpha-band activity reflects single word intelligibility , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[30]  Darren Price,et al.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  H. Berger Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen , 1938, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[32]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  To See or Not to See: Prestimulus α Phase Predicts Visual Awareness , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Diego Vidaurre,et al.  Spontaneous cortical activity transiently organises into frequency specific phase-coupling networks , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Measurement of dynamic task related functional networks using MEG , 2017, NeuroImage.

[35]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[38]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Cynthia G. Wible,et al.  Investigation of spectrally coherent resting‐state networks using non‐negative matrix factorization for functional MRI data , 2011, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[41]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  The heritability of multi-modal connectivity in human brain activity , 2017, eLife.

[42]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Reduce Temporal Long-Range Dependence in Spontaneous Human Brain Activity , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes , 2015, NeuroImage.

[45]  S. Jbabdi,et al.  Resting connectivity predicts task activation in pre-surgical populations , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.