The Virtual Individual Education Plan (IEP) Team: Using Online Collaboration to Develop a Behavior Intervention Plan

A team of professional educators in a private school for children with disabilities a Virtual IEP Team used an online platform to collaborate and produce a behavior intervention plan for a student. The collaboration was effective and efficient; the plan was produced in 9 days, rather than the customary 3-6 weeks. Qualitative data yielded four major themes: beneficial augmentation, reflective practice, barriers to change, and improved interactions. Quantitative results showed that although end user satisfaction was moderate, they produced a successful behavior intervention plan that showed positive changes in both the teacher and student behavior. An increase of in-person staff discussion as a result of online dialogue was a unique finding in this study warranting further investigation. Now that federal U.S. education law has changed to allow technologically mediated IEP meetings, the Virtual IEP Team may serve as a model for more efficient use of education professionals' time.

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  Marshall Welch,et al.  Collaboration: Staying on the Bandwagon , 1998 .

[3]  Mark Hawkes,et al.  Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development , 2001 .

[4]  N. Tavares,et al.  Obstacles as Opportunities in the Promotion of Teachers' Learning. , 2004 .

[5]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  Education mirrors industry: on the not-so surprising rise of internet distance education , 2004 .

[6]  D. Bailey,et al.  Inclusive preschool programs: Classroom ecology and child outcomes , 2000 .

[7]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[8]  N. Kock,et al.  Media Compensation Theory: A Darwinian Perspective on Adaptation to Electronic Communication and Collaboration , 2011 .

[9]  Pa¨ivi Ha¨kkinen.  Collaborative learning in networked environments: Interaction through shared workspaces and communication tools , 2003 .

[10]  Susan Gasson,et al.  Adaptations that Virtual Teams Make so that Complex Tasks Can Be Performed Using Simple E-Collaboration Technologies , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..

[11]  Jonida Shtylla,et al.  Computer mediated communication , 2011 .

[12]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[14]  Kai Riemer,et al.  E-Collaboration Systems: Identification of System Classes using Cluster Analysis , 2009, Int. J. e Collab..

[15]  G. Tindal,et al.  Effective School Consultation: An Interactive Approach , 1993 .

[16]  P. Campbell,et al.  Between Research and Practice , 2002 .

[17]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Creating a “Connected” Community? Teachers’ Use of an Electronic Discussion Group , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[18]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  The effects of download delay on performance and end-user satisfaction in an Internet tutorial , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Yong Zhao,et al.  The Non-Neutrality of Technology: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study of Computer Mediated Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[20]  Paivi Hakkinen,et al.  Collaborative Learning in Networked Environments: Interaction through Shared Workspaces and Communication Tools , 2003 .

[21]  Ned Kock,et al.  Encyclopedia of E-collaboration , 2007 .

[22]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings , 2006 .

[23]  Ned Kock,et al.  Communication flow orientation in business process modeling and its effect on redesign success: Results from a field study , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Catherine Poling,et al.  Blog On: Building Communication and Collaboration Among Staff and Students. , 2005 .

[25]  Ned Kock,et al.  Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective , 2004 .

[26]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[27]  Richard Baskerville.  Hacker Wars: E-Collaboration by Vandals and Warriors , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..

[28]  Nancy L. Waldron,et al.  Learning from Collaboration: The Role of Teacher Qualities , 2006 .

[29]  Stephen W. Smith.  Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in Special Education—From Intent to Acquiescence , 1990 .

[30]  Donna McGhie-Richmond,et al.  Using computer conferencing and case studies to enable collaboration between expert and novice teachers , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Angeliki Poulymenakou,et al.  Technology Adaptation: Capturing the Appropriation Dynamics of Web-Based Collaboration Support in a Project Team , 2008, Int. J. e Collab..

[32]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  Safe Passages , 2003 .

[33]  Maria Apparecida Mamede-Neves.  Contribution of Psychopedagogy to the Inclusion of ICT in the Pedagogical Environment , 2006 .

[34]  Shu Ching Yang,et al.  Case study of online workshop for the professional development of teachers , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Olivier Caya,et al.  Virtual Teams: What We Know, What We Don't Know , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[36]  J. Stowitschek,et al.  Islands With Bridges: Using the Web to Enhance Ongoing Problem Solving Among Educators of Young Children With Special Needs , 2006 .

[38]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  Mark Hawkes.  Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication for Collaborative Teacher Development. , 2000 .

[40]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Introduction: Computer-Mediated Collaborative Practices , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  Anita L. Blanchard.  Virtual Behavior Settings: An Application of Behavior Setting Theories to Virtual Communities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[43]  David McConnell,et al.  Action Research and Distributed Problem-Based Learning in Continuing Professional Education , 2002 .

[44]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation , 1999, CSCL.

[45]  Vicki L. Sauter.  Information Technology Adoption by Groups Across Time , 2008, Int. J. e Collab..

[46]  A. E. Veldhuis-Diermanse,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education , 2001 .

[47]  Tim Hobbs,et al.  The Virtual Conference Room: Online Problem Solving for First Year Special Educators , 2002 .

[48]  Donna McGhie-Richmond,et al.  Exploring the Role of Computer Conferencing in Enabling Collaboration between Expert & Novice Teachers. , 2005 .

[49]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction , 1999 .