International activity of the innovative enterprises – experience and recommendations

Research background:.In the international literature we can find great examples of research in the field of innovation and technological cooperation boosting between companies. Confrontation of theory and empirical research shows that meaning of cooperation and geographical closeness for innovative activity as well as the quality and effectiveness of public support are still ambiguous. Public support of technological cooperation is connected with different components of innovative network, that shows the need of horizontal cooperation, what is legitimate in developed countries. Great example of that kind of international network is Enterprise Europe Network (EEN). Innovative cooperation and technology transfer infiltration always have been a subject of research, but still there are issues to investigate. Because of that reason, there was a research hypothesis created: international technology transfer performed among companies and other economic entities accelerates innovative processes and gives profits for both players. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this article is to show different aspects among cooperation and technology transfer and trial to evaluate its synergical impact on international innovative activity of companies. Methodology/methods: This paper illustrates theoretical and empirical research in the scope of many aspects of innovative cooperation and technology transfer. The empirical analysis focused on data from the Enterprise Europe Network in 2009-2015 and interviews with offices supporting companies in starting and performing of international technological cooperation. The presentation of spatial connections of technological cooperation was illustrated by the Gastner Newman’s amorphous (eumorphous) choropleth, created in the ArcMap 10.4.1 programme with the use of the quantile method. Findings: The article discusses the role of cooperation among network in the international technology transfer. A special analytical emphasis was put on the public networks supporting such cooperation. Specific knowledge and technology is very often out of reach for companies (especially SMEs) because of costs or limited access, and cooperation provides the opportunity to create new relations which can integrate ideas and knowledge, and in effect, lead to new ground-breaking innovations. There is also the significant element like public support for companies in the whole technology transfer process.

[1]  A. Pyka,et al.  What drives the internationalisation of innovation? Evidence from European patent data , 2010 .

[2]  H. Vredenburg,et al.  Building Corporate Citizenship through Strategic Bridging in the Oil and Gas Industry in Latin America , 2003 .

[3]  Shin-Horng Chen Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and the connection with the global innovation network , 2004 .

[4]  Susan M. Mudambi,et al.  The Outsourcing of It-Enabled Business Processes: A Conceptual Model of the Location Decision , 2005 .

[5]  Dariusz Firszt Międzynarodowy transfer technologii a modernizacja polskiej gospodarki , 2011 .

[6]  W. Kuemmerle The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[7]  Aracruz Celulose S.A Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment , 1992 .

[8]  R. Narula Globalisation and technology: interdependence, innovation systems and industrial policy. Chinese edition , 2003 .

[9]  Roman Boutellier,et al.  Impact of Office Layout on Communication in a Science-Driven Business , 2008 .

[10]  B. V. P. D. L. Potterie,et al.  The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data , 2001 .

[11]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  International and Domestic Technology Transfers and Productivity Growth: Firm Level Evidence , 2010 .

[12]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  International R&D service outsourcing by technology-intensive firms: Whether and where? , 2012 .

[13]  Walter P Kilareski,et al.  Enhanced Technology Transfer Through Strategic Planning, Partnering, and Model Integration , 1997 .

[14]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations , 2008 .

[15]  E. Boria Mapping society: an ingenious but today outdated map , 2013 .

[16]  Lucio Picci,et al.  The Internationalization of Inventive Activity: A Gravity Model Using Patent Data , 2010 .

[17]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[18]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[19]  A. P. Man,et al.  Transitory Alliances: An Instrument for Surviving Turbulent Industries? , 2003 .

[20]  Stanisław Umiński Znaczenie zagranicznych inwestycji bezpośrednich dla transferu technologii do Polski , 2000 .

[21]  Daria Taglioni,et al.  The Gravity Model in International Trade , 2010 .

[22]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[23]  A. Osman-Gani INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF HRD , 1999 .

[24]  Giuditta De Prato,et al.  Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[25]  Lydia Y. Chen,et al.  Effects of Technology Cycles on Strategic Alliances , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[26]  R. Narula,et al.  Globalisation and trends in international R+D alliances , 2003 .

[27]  Agnieszka Kochel Formy miêdzynarodowego transferu technologii przez korporacje transnarodowe , 2012 .