Revisiting Fisher’s ‘Lady Tasting Tea’ from a perspective of sensory discrimination testing

Abstract The Lady Tasting Tea is a famous real story in the history of development of statistics, related to R.A. Fisher, one of the greatest statisticians and founders of modern statistics. The main learning and insight offered by this paper from revisiting the story are that the methodology of conventional sensory difference tests can be and should be expanded to cover the ‘ M  +  N ’ method with larger M and N . Unlike the conventional discrimination tests, which use multiple sets of ‘ M  +  N ’ samples with small M and N based on a binomial model, the ‘ M  +  N ’ tests with larger M and N can reach a statistical significance in a single trial using only one set of ‘ M  +  N ’ samples based on a hypergeometric distribution in Fisher’s exact test. This paper explores the applications of the new methods particularly in assessing performance of trained sensory panels and panelists. The connection of the odds ratio or common odds ratio with Cohen’s standardized mean difference d is also discussed.

[1]  S. Chinn A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[3]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  d′ and variance of d′ for four-alternative forced choice (4-AFC). , 2010 .

[4]  D. Salsburg The lady tasting tea : how statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century , 2002 .

[5]  H. Kalmus,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TASTE SENSITIVITY TO PHENYLTHIOUREA (P.T.C.) , 1949 .

[6]  Joan Fisher Box,et al.  R. A. Fisher, the Life of a Scientist , 1978 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  D. Basker POLYGONAL AND POLYHEDRAL TASTE TESTING1 , 1980 .

[10]  John M. Ennis A Thurstonian Analysis of the Two‐Out‐of‐Five Test , 2013 .

[11]  Rose Marie Pangborn,et al.  Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1965 .

[12]  Malcolm C. Pike,et al.  The Power Function of the “Exact” Test for Comparing Two Binomial Distributions , 1978 .

[13]  D. J. Finney Statistical Method in Biological Assay , 1966 .

[14]  Power evaluation of small drug and vaccine experiments with binary outcomes. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[16]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues. , 1998 .

[17]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  N. T. Gridgeman The Lady Tasting Tea, and Allied Topics , 1959 .

[19]  Julio Sánchez-Meca,et al.  Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[20]  Estimation of Thurstonian Models for Various Forced‐Choice Sensory Discrimination Methods as a Form of the “M + N” Test , 2014 .

[21]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[22]  A. Agresti [A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables]: Rejoinder , 1992 .

[23]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[24]  B. M. Bennett,et al.  On the power function of the exact test for the 2×2 contingency table , 1960 .