Evaluating the Use of Data Transformation for Information Visualization

Data transformation, the process of preparing raw data for effective visualization, is one of the key challenges in information visualization. Although researchers have developed many data transformation techniques, there is little empirical study of the general impact of data transformation on visualization. Without such study, it is difficult to systematically decide when and which data transformation techniques are needed. We thus have designed and conducted a two-part empirical study that examines how the use of common data transformation techniques impacts visualization quality, which in turn affects user task performance. Our first experiment studies the impact of data transformation on user performance in single-step, typical visual analytic tasks. The second experiment assesses the impact of data transformation in multi-step analytic tasks. Our results quantify the benefits of data transformation in both experiments. More importantly, our analyses reveal that (1) the benefits of data transformation vary significantly by task and by visualization, and (2) the use of data transformation depends on a user's interaction context. Based on our findings, we present a set of design recommendations that help guide the development and use of data transformation techniques.

[1]  T. J. Watson,et al.  Ordering Categorical Data to Improve VisualizationSheng , 1999 .

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Knowledge discovery in high-dimensional data: case studies and a user survey for the rank-by-feature framework , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  A Rank-by-Feature Framework for Interactive Exploration of Multidimensional Data , 2005, Inf. Vis..

[4]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  Task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations , 1991, TOGS.

[5]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  High-Dimensional Visual Analytics: Interactive Exploration Guided by Pairwise Views of Point Distributions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  Data characterization for intelligent graphics presentation , 1990, CHI '90.

[8]  Alexander W. Skaburskis,et al.  The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods , 2006, CHI.

[9]  John T. Stasko,et al.  An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[11]  Alfred Kobsa.  User Experiments with Tree Visualization Systems , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[12]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques , 1990, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization `90.

[13]  James R. Eagan,et al.  Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005..

[14]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Measuring Data Abstraction Quality in Multiresolution Visualizations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Chris North,et al.  An Insight-Based Longitudinal Study of Visual Analytics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Bernice E. Rogowitz,et al.  How not to lie with visualization , 1996 .

[17]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information , 1986, TOGS.

[18]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Interactive hierarchical dimension ordering, spacing and filtering for exploration of high dimensional datasets , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[19]  WenZhen,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Data Transformation for Information Visualization , 2008 .

[20]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  An initial examination of ease of use for 2D and 3D information visualizations of web content , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Elke A. Rundensteiner,et al.  Measuring Data Abstraction Quality in Multiresolution Visualization ∗ , 2006 .

[22]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Empirical evaluation of information visualizations: an introduction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Chris North,et al.  Toward measuring visualization insight , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.