Optimization of High Throughput Virtual Screening by Combining Shape-Matching and Docking Methods
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jiwon Choi | Ruben Abagyan | Irina Kufareva | Sukjoon Yoon | Hui Sun Lee | Anton V. Filikov | Young Yang | R. Abagyan | Sukjoon Yoon | I. Kufareva | Jiwon Choi | Hui-Sun Lee | Young Yang | A. Filikov
[1] P. Hawkins,et al. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] Heikki Mannila,et al. Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.
[3] Andrew Smellie,et al. Surrogate docking: structure-based virtual screening at high throughput speed , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[4] I. Kuntz,et al. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[5] Heather A Carlson,et al. Protein flexibility is an important component of structure-based drug discovery. , 2002, Current pharmaceutical design.
[6] J A McCammon,et al. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.
[7] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[8] G. Vigers,et al. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[9] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Virtual screening methods that complement HTS. , 2004, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[10] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[11] Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al. Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.
[12] R. Friesner,et al. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[13] S. Teague. Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[14] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[15] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[16] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[17] Christopher W. Murray,et al. The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[18] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] G. Klebe. Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.
[20] William J. Welsh,et al. Identification of a Minimal Subset of Receptor Conformations for Improved Multiple Conformation Docking and Two-Step Scoring , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[21] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Comparison of Topological, Shape, and Docking Methods in Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[22] Ruben Abagyan,et al. ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..