Bounds to precision for quantum interferometry with Gaussian states and operations

We address high-precision measurements by active and passive interferometric schemes based on Gaussian states and operations. In particular, we look for the best states to be injected into their ports according to the quantum Cramer–Rao bound, i.e., maximizing the quantum Fisher information over all the involved parameters, given a constraint on the overall mean number of photons entering into the interferometer. We found that for passive interferometers involving only beam splitters, the optimal input leading to Heisenberg scaling is a pair of identical squeezed-coherent states with at most one-third of the total energy employed in squeezing. For active interferometers involving optical amplifiers, input coherent signals are enough to achieve Heisenberg scaling, given an optimal value of the amplification gain. For passive schemes our results clarify the role of squeezing in improving both the reference phase and the signal phase of an interferometer.

[1]  Alex Monras,et al.  Phase space formalism for quantum estimation of Gaussian states , 2013, 1303.3682.

[2]  S. Olivares,et al.  Optimized interferometry with Gaussian states , 2007 .

[3]  Zhang Jiang,et al.  Quantum Fisher information for states in exponential form , 2013, 1310.2687.

[4]  Ivette Fuentes,et al.  Quantum parameter estimation using multi-mode Gaussian states , 2015, 1502.07924.

[5]  Vadim N. Smelyanskiy,et al.  Scaling laws for precision in quantum interferometry and the bifurcation landscape of the optimal state , 2010, 1006.1645.

[6]  Christopher C. Gerry,et al.  Heisenberg-limit interferometry with four-wave mixers operating in a nonlinear regime , 2000 .

[7]  Augusto Smerzi,et al.  Phase-sensitivity bounds for two-mode interferometers , 2015 .

[8]  S. Olivares,et al.  Fidelity matters: the birth of entanglement in the mixing of Gaussian states. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[9]  M. G. A. Paris,et al.  Multimode entanglement and telecloning in a noisy environment (12 pages) , 2005 .

[10]  Matteo G. A. Paris Small amount of squeezing in high-sensitive realistic interferometry , 1995 .

[11]  C. Caves Quantum Mechanical Noise in an Interferometer , 1981 .

[12]  Matthias D. Lang,et al.  Optimal quantum-enhanced interferometry , 2014, 1406.3274.

[13]  G. Milburn,et al.  Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance , 1995, quant-ph/9507004.

[14]  Christopher C. Gerry,et al.  Optical interferometry at the Heisenberg limit with twin Fock states and parity measurements , 2003 .

[15]  Gerardo Adesso,et al.  Gaussian Interferometric Power , 2014, 1406.5857.

[16]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Quantum Reading of a Classical Digital Memory , 2011, Physical review letters.

[17]  I. Walmsley,et al.  Experimental quantum-enhanced estimation of a lossy phase shift , 2009, 0906.3511.

[18]  Kirk McKenzie,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a squeezing-enhanced power-recycled michelson interferometer for gravitational wave detection. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[19]  G. Agarwal,et al.  Coherent-Light Boosted, Super-Sensitive, Quantum Interferometery , 2010 .

[20]  Marcin Jarzyna,et al.  Quantum interferometry with and without an external phase reference , 2012 .

[21]  John L. Hall,et al.  Influence of decorrelation on Heisenberg-limited interferometry with quantum correlated photons , 1998 .

[22]  Lane,et al.  Maximum-likelihood statistics of multiple quantum phase measurements. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[23]  Konrad Banaszek,et al.  Fundamental quantum interferometry bound for the squeezed-light-enhanced gravitational wave detector GEO 600 , 2013, 1305.7268.

[24]  N. Treps,et al.  Quantum parameter estimation using general single-mode Gaussian states , 2013, 1307.5318.

[25]  Stefano Olivares,et al.  Optical phase estimation in the presence of phase diffusion. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[26]  Samuel L. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum reading capacity , 2011, 1107.3500.

[27]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[28]  M. G. A. Paris,et al.  Three-mode entanglement by interlinked nonlinear interactions in optical χ (2) media , 2004 .

[29]  Holland,et al.  Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the Heisenberg limit. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[30]  Matteo G. A. Paris,et al.  Bayesian estimation in homodyne interferometry , 2009, 0901.2585.

[31]  Klauder,et al.  SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[32]  Alex Monras Optimal phase measurements with pure Gaussian states , 2006 .

[33]  Jonathan P. Dowling,et al.  Coherent-light-boosted, sub-shot noise, quantum interferometry , 2009, 0911.5714.

[34]  Klauder,et al.  SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[35]  Augusto Smerzi,et al.  Mach-Zehnder interferometry at the Heisenberg limit with coherent and squeezed-vacuum light. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[36]  Y. F. Huang,et al.  Experimental demonstration of phase measurement precision beating standard quantum limit by projection measurement , 2007, 0710.2922.

[37]  Michele Dall'Arno,et al.  Tradeoff between energy and error in the discrimination of quantum-optical devices , 2011, 1104.4228.

[38]  C. Helstrom Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1969 .

[39]  R. Adhikari,et al.  Gravitational Radiation Detection with Laser Interferometry , 2013, 1305.5188.

[40]  Dorje C. Brody,et al.  Statistical geometry in quantum mechanics , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[41]  David Blair,et al.  A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit: Squeezed light in application , 2011, 1109.2295.

[42]  Dorje C. Brody,et al.  Geometrization of statistical mechanics , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[43]  Hradil,et al.  Entropy of phase measurement: Quantum phase via quadrature measurement. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[44]  J. Dowling Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states , 2008, 0904.0163.

[45]  A Smerzi,et al.  Phase detection at the quantum limit with multiphoton Mach-Zehnder interferometry. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[46]  M. Paris Quantum estimation for quantum technology , 2008, 0804.2981.

[47]  Matthias D. Lang,et al.  Optimal quantum-enhanced interferometry using a laser power source. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[48]  Hugo Cable,et al.  Parameter estimation with entangled photons produced by parametric down-conversion. , 2010, Physical review letters.