The Effects of Intra-individual Goal Conflict on Performance

Two studies are reported on an aspect of goal setting that has not been explicitly researched to date, namely, intra-individual goal conflict. The first study utilized an experimental, laboratory design using student teams in which conflicting goals (quantity vs. quality) were assigned. The second study was a correlational, field study of college professors which measured conflict between teaching and research. In both studies conflict was negatively related to at least one performance outcome. This negative association was not mediated by goal commitment, goal priority, goal level or task strategies in either study. In both cases, the main source of the conflict was pressure.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Power in and Around Organizations , 1983 .

[2]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Role Clarity Among University and College Faculty , 2017 .

[3]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  The structure of work: Job design and roles. , 1991 .

[4]  R. Vance,et al.  Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. , 1990 .

[5]  R. Kahn,et al.  Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. , 1965 .

[6]  K. Lewin.  Environmental forces in child behavior and development. , 1931 .

[7]  L. McKay.  Overcoming resistance to change. , 1993, Canadian journal of nursing administration.

[8]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  Effects of self- and competitor goals on performance in an interdependent bargaining task , 1987 .

[9]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[10]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[11]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? , 1984 .

[12]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Goal-setting as a determinant of the effect of knowledge of score on performance. , 1968 .

[13]  D. Hall,et al.  Job pressures and research performance. , 1971, American scientist.

[14]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez–Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. , 1988 .

[15]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  The Impact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model , 1985 .

[16]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Effects of goal difficulty, self-set goals, and monetary rewards on dual task performance , 1990 .

[17]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[18]  John M. Ivancevich,et al.  Effects of goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. , 1976 .

[19]  J. Ivancevich.  Changes in Performance in a Management by Objectives Program. , 1974 .

[20]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Effects of valence, expectancies, and goal-performance discrepancies in single and multiple goal environments. , 1990 .

[21]  Klaus-Helmut Schmidt,et al.  Motivational control of motor performance by goal setting in a dual-task situation , 1984 .

[22]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[23]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[24]  J. Bavelas,et al.  Effects of goal level on performance: a trade-off of quantity and quality. , 1978, Canadian journal of psychology.

[25]  Lynda A. King,et al.  Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity: A Critical Assessment of Construct Validity , 1990 .

[26]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[27]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Atkinson's Inverse-U Curve and the Missing Cognitive Variables , 1984 .