Reliability-Rate Tradeoff in Large-Scale Multiple Access Relay Networks

We consider random network coding in noisy large-scale multiple-access relay networks in which the source packets that are correctly received at a relay are linearly combined with randomly chosen coefficients and forwarded to the destination. We derive the union bound on the average probability of decoding error at the destination with the maximum likelihood decoding, averaged over all possible node locations and relay encoding rules. The union bound provides an upper bound to the probability of decoding error with the best network coding scheme and enables us to determine the error exponent. From the error exponent, we determine the reliability-rate tradeoff and the achievable rate at the high node density regime. The high node density analysis is useful for understanding the performance of large-scale multiple access relay networks. The energy saving at a source node offered by the energy expenditure at a relay node and the optimum constellation size that minimizes the energy per information bit (Eb/N0) are investigated as a function of reliability, rate, and node density. The effect of MIMO transmit modes at the relay nodes, when they are equipped with multiple antennas, on the network-wide reliability-rate tradeoff is investigated. The insight provided by the analysis is useful for understanding of the fundamental limit and tradeoffs in large-scale multiple-access relay networks with network coding.

[1]  Yunnan Wu,et al.  Information Exchange in Wireless Networks with Network Coding and Physical-layer Broadcast , 2004 .

[2]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[3]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Tiffany Jing Li,et al.  Adaptive network coded cooperation (ANCC) for wireless relay networks: matching code-on-graph with network-on-graph , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  J.N. Laneman,et al.  The Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff for the Multiaccess Relay Channel , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[6]  Jing Li,et al.  Wireless diversity through network coding , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[7]  Qian Zhang,et al.  On the Performance Analysis of Network-Coded Cooperation in Wireless Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Abbas El Gamal,et al.  Capacity theorems for the relay channel , 1979, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Switching between diversity and multiplexing in MIMO systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[12]  R. Koetter,et al.  The benefits of coding over routing in a randomized setting , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Network information flow , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Shuo-Yen Robert Li,et al.  Linear network coding , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..