Protocol for hunting PM2.5 emission hot spots in cities

Particulate Matter (PM) is a major air pollutant that has the potential for adversely affecting human health. Actionable data on the spatial distribution of temporal variability of PM2.5 emission hot spots in large cities are sparse. The main objective of this research is to provide a protocol for using search agents to hunt for PM2.5 emission hot spots in urban environments. We propose short range identification of variability of harmful PM2.5 concentrations can be achieved using IoT devices mounted on a mobile platform. We propose that long range identification the PM2.5 emission hot spots can attained by searching through the city on different days. We applied this approach to Hyderabad, India by fixing a mobile platform on a street car. We corrected the IoT device measurement errors by calibrating the sensing component data against a reference instrument co-located on the mobile platform. We identified that random forest regression was the most suitable technique to reduce the variability between the IoT devices. The spatial variability of PM2.5 harmful emission hot spots at industrial settings and congested roads were identified. The temporal variability based on image processing shows a weak correlation between PM2.5 concentrations and number of vehicles, and PM2.5 and visibility. The Hyderabad PM2.5 emission hot spots findings demonstrate a clear need to inform people with heart and lung conditions when it is unhealthy to be outside; and when it is unhealthy for children and elderly people to be outside for prolonged periods. Our emission hunting approach can be applied to any mobile platform carried by people walking, cycling or by drones and robots in any city.

[1]  K. S. Rajan,et al.  Development of End-to-End Low-Cost IoT System for Densely Deployed PM Monitoring Network: An Indian Case Study , 2022, ArXiv.

[2]  Sachin Chaudhari,et al.  IoT-based AQI Estimation using Image Processing and Learning Methods , 2022, 2022 IEEE 8th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[3]  S. Dahech,et al.  Spatiotemporal Variation of Air Quality (PM and NO2) in Southern Paris during COVID-19 Lockdown Periods , 2022, Atmosphere.

[4]  A. Huertas,et al.  City Wide Participatory Sensing of Air Quality , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[5]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  mMTC Deployment over Sliceable Infrastructure: The Megasense Scenario , 2021, IEEE Network.

[6]  Liu Changyu,et al.  ultralytics/yolov5: v6.0 - YOLOv5n 'Nano' models, Roboflow integration, TensorFlow export, OpenCV DNN support , 2021 .

[7]  Naser Hossein Motlagh,et al.  Transit Pollution Exposure Monitoring using Low-Cost Wearable Sensors , 2021 .

[8]  A. Ding,et al.  The effect of urban morphological characteristics on the spatial variation of PM2.5 air quality in downtown Nanjing , 2021, Environmental science: atmospheres.

[9]  Iqbal H. Sarker Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions , 2021, SN Computer Science.

[10]  Sasu Tarkoma,et al.  MegaSense: Cyber-Physical System for Real-time Urban Air Quality Monitoring , 2020, 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA).

[11]  Naser Hossein Motlagh,et al.  Low-cost Air Quality Sensing Process: Validation by Indoor-Outdoor Measurements , 2020, 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA).

[12]  Matti Siekkinen,et al.  Toward Massive Scale Air Quality Monitoring , 2020, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Sasu Tarkoma,et al.  Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration , 2019, ACM Trans. Sens. Networks.

[14]  Adam M. Boies,et al.  Field Calibration of Low-Cost Air Pollution Sensors , 2019 .

[15]  Matthew D. Adams,et al.  A Mobile Air Pollution Monitoring Data Set , 2018, Data.

[16]  C. V. Jawahar,et al.  IDD: A Dataset for Exploring Problems of Autonomous Navigation in Unconstrained Environments , 2018, 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[17]  Zhong Ma,et al.  Spatial-temporal patterns of PM2.5 concentrations for 338 Chinese cities. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Evan Coffey,et al.  Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors , 2018 .

[19]  M. Brauer,et al.  High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Gb Stewart,et al.  The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks , 2013 .

[21]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  A R Al-Ali,et al.  A Mobile GPRS-Sensors Array for Air Pollution Monitoring , 2010, IEEE Sensors Journal.