Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: An 18-Month Prospective Study.

PURPOSE To investigate the long-term visual outcomes and optical quality after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate to high myopia correction. METHODS Fifty-four patients (37 women, 17 men) who underwent SMILE were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 40 years, with a mean spherical equivalent of -6.50 ± 1.64 diopters. Data including refractive parameters, retinal image quality, intraocular scattering, and aberrations were collected at 6 and 18 months after surgery. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. RESULTS At 18 months after surgery, both the mean safety index and the efficacy index were 1.23 ± 0.23 (range: 0.80 to 1.50); there was no significant difference with indices measured at 6 months (P > .05). No patient lost two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. Total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and coma significantly increased after SMILE (P < .05), whereas total spherical aberrations and trefoil changed only slightly. The mean modulation transfer function cutoff frequency was 36.66 ± 8.54 cycles per degree (cpd) before surgery and 37.81 ± 6.89 cpd at 18 months postoperatively; the mean objective scatter index was 0.62 ± 0.33 before surgery and 0.71 ± 0.38 at 18 months postoperatively. No significant difference was found between the three time points (P > .05). Mean patient satisfaction was 9.31 ± 0.64 (with a maximum score of 10). CONCLUSIONS SMILE showed good safety, efficacy, and stability in correcting moderate to high myopia, and patients were highly satisfied. HOAs increased after SMILE, mainly due to the increase of coma, whereas retinal image quality and intraocular scattering barely changed.

[1]  J. Zhao,et al.  Quantitative analysis of Microdistortions in Bowman's Layer using optical coherence tomography after SMILE among different myopic corrections. , 2015, Journal of refractive surgery.

[2]  Wenjing Wu,et al.  Vector analysis of low to moderate astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): results of a 1-year follow-up , 2015, BMC Ophthalmology.

[3]  Ye-sheng Xu,et al.  Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia: Results of a 12-Month Prospective Study , 2015, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  D. Reinstein,et al.  Outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low myopia. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Objective optical quality and intraocular scattering in myopic adults. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Corneal biomechanical effects: Small‐incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  J. Zhao,et al.  Mild decentration measured by a Scheimpflug camera and its impact on visual quality following SMILE in the early learning curve. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Yongfu Yu,et al.  Optical quality and intraocular scattering after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[9]  A. Ivarsen,et al.  Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[10]  W. Sekundo,et al.  One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE) , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Grauslund,et al.  Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Grauslund,et al.  Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Microdistortions in Bowman's Layer Following Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Observed by Fourier-Domain OCT. , 2013, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  A. Ivarsen,et al.  Small‐incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: Predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  Jaume Pujol,et al.  Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population , 2011, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[17]  Jaume Pujol,et al.  An Objective Scatter Index Based on Double-Pass Retinal Images of a Point Source to Classify Cataracts , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  R. Shah,et al.  Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All‐in‐one femtosecond laser refractive surgery , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  Juan C. Ondategui,et al.  Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on vision analyzed using preoperative optical quality , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  M. Blum,et al.  Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  Alain Saad,et al.  Repeatability of measurements with a double‐pass system , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  Jaume Pujol,et al.  Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.