Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity

Conservation scientists, national governments, and international conservation groups seek to devise, and implement, governance strategies that mitigate human impact on the environment. However, few studies to date have systematically investigated the performance of different systems of governance in achieving successful conservation outcomes. Here, we use a newly-developed analytic framework to conduct analyses of a suite of case studies, linking different governance strategies to standardized scores for delivering ecosystem services, achieving sustainable use of natural resources, and conserving biodiversity, at both local and international levels. Our results: (i) confirm the benefits of adaptive management; and (ii) reveal strong associations for the role of leadership. Our work provides a critical step toward implementing empirically justified governance strategies that are capable of improving the management of human-altered environments, with benefits for both biodiversity and people.

[1]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Marine reserves and fisheries management. , 2002, Science.

[2]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[3]  Amar Inamdar,et al.  Capitalizing on Nature: Protected Area Management , 1999, Science.

[4]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[5]  Ben Collen,et al.  Tracking Progress Toward the 2010 Biodiversity Target and Beyond , 2009, Science.

[6]  Keri Parker,et al.  Defining Leadership in Conservation: a View from the Top , 2004 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[8]  A. Newton,et al.  Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Science.

[9]  M. Walpole,et al.  Governance and the loss of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[10]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[11]  N. Leader‐Williams,et al.  Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests , 2003, Oryx.

[12]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice , 2010 .

[13]  Scott E. Stephens,et al.  Leadership: a New Frontier in Conservation Science , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[15]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Balancing the Earth's accounts , 1999, Nature.

[16]  W. Adams,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty , 2004, Science.

[17]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[18]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[19]  D. Feeny,et al.  The benefits of the commons , 1989, Nature.

[20]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Forest commons and local enforcement , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Ben Collen,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation and the Millennium Development Goals , 2009, Science.

[22]  Mark J. Whittingham,et al.  Habitat selection by yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella on lowland farmland at two spatial scales: implications for conservation management , 2005 .

[23]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity , 2002, Science.

[24]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[26]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[27]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Carbon markets and forest conservation: a review of the environmental benefits of REDD mechanisms. , 2009 .