What we see is what we touch? Sex estimation on the pelvis in virtual anthropology

[1]  Hanna Jepps,et al.  Assessing the Feasibility of Estimating the Age and Sex from Virtual 3d Models: A Pilot Study Into Virtual Forensic Anthropology , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  V. Campanacho,et al.  Topical Collection “The Rise of Forensic Anthropology and Documented Human Osteological Collections” , 2022, Forensic Sciences.

[3]  R. Jantz,et al.  Survivability versus rate of recovery for skeletal elements in forensic anthropology , 2022, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  M. Milella,et al.  Perimortem Skeletal Sharp Force Trauma: Detection Reliability on CT Data, Demographics and Anatomical Patterns from a Forensic Dataset , 2022, Biology.

[5]  M. G. Belcastro,et al.  Scientific and Ethical Aspects of Identified Skeletal Series: The Case of the Documented Human Osteological Collections of the University of Bologna (Northern Italy) , 2022, Forensic Sciences.

[6]  A. Oettlé,et al.  Repeatability of a morphoscopic sex estimation technique for the mental eminence on micro-focus X-ray computed tomography models. , 2022, Forensic Imaging.

[7]  E. L'Abbé,et al.  The Pretoria Bone Collection: A 21st Century Skeletal Collection in South Africa , 2021, Forensic Sciences.

[8]  L. Indra,et al.  Forensic anthropology casework from Switzerland (Bern): Taphonomic implications for the future , 2021 .

[9]  M. Steyn,et al.  Technical Note: The Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE) Map of Identified Osteological Collections. , 2021, Forensic science international.

[10]  C. Villa,et al.  How 3D printing and physical reconstruction of a skull helped in a complex pathological case. , 2021, Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur.

[11]  P. Mahakkanukrauh,et al.  The importance of human osteological collections: Our past, present, and future. , 2021, Forensic science international.

[12]  Terrie Simmons-Ehrhardt,et al.  Open Osteology: Medical Imaging Databases as Skeletal Collections , 2021 .

[13]  R. Martin,et al.  The obstetrical dilemma hypothesis: there's life in the old dog yet , 2021, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  M. Steyn,et al.  Can forensic anthropologists accurately detect skeletal trauma using radiological imaging? , 2021 .

[15]  P. Mitteroecker,et al.  Three‐dimensional surface scanning methods in osteology: A topographical and geometric morphometric comparison , 2021, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  Lorenzo Campana,et al.  Virtual anthropology: a preliminary test of macroscopic observation versus 3D surface scans and computed tomography (CT) scans , 2020, Forensic sciences research.

[17]  R. Salisbury,et al.  Child murder in the Early Bronze Age: proteomic sex identification of a cold case from Schleinbach, Austria , 2020, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[18]  C. Sforza,et al.  Pitfalls of Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction Models in Cranial Nonmetric Analysis* , 2020, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  J. Krause,et al.  Ancient genomes reveal social and genetic structure of Late Neolithic Switzerland , 2020, Nature Communications.

[20]  N. Márquez-Grant,et al.  Ethical Approaches to Human Remains: A Global Challenge in Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology , 2020 .

[21]  Kerri L. Colman,et al.  Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans. , 2019, Forensic science international.

[22]  A. Brough,et al.  The benefits of medical imaging and 3D modelling to the field of forensic anthropology positional statement of the members of the forensic anthropology working group of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging , 2019, Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging.

[23]  J. Brůžek,et al.  A method of sexing the human os coxae based on logistic regressions and Bruzek's nonmetric traits. , 2019, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  P. Badino,et al.  Role of Radiology in the Assessment of Skeletons from Archeological Sites. , 2019, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[25]  Kerri L. Colman,et al.  The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation , 2019, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[26]  David Errickson,et al.  Imaging in forensic science: Five years on , 2019, Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging.

[27]  Felippe Bevilacqua Prado,et al.  Application and validation of Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste V2 tool in a miscegenated population. , 2018, Forensic science international.

[28]  K. Blake,et al.  Metric Assessment of the Pubic Bone Using Known and Novel Data Points for Sex Estimation , , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  Lorenzo Campana,et al.  The application of different 3D-scan-systems and photogrammetry at an excavation - A Neolithic dolmen from Switzerland , 2018, Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Heritage.

[30]  Brenna R. Hassett,et al.  Which Bone to Pick: Creation, Curation, and Dissemination of Online 3D Digital Bioarchaeological Data , 2018, Archaeologies.

[31]  B. Hassett.  Which Bone to Pick: Creation, Curation, and Dissemination of Online 3D Digital Bioarchaeological Data , 2018, Archaeologies.

[32]  H. Garvin,et al.  A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.

[33]  Christa Boer,et al.  Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[34]  P. Perlea,et al.  Forensic anthropology from skeletal remains to CT scans: A review on sexual dimorphism of human skull , 2017 .

[35]  T. Uldin.  Virtual anthropology – a brief review of the literature and history of computed tomography , 2017, Forensic sciences research.

[36]  Michael W. Kenyhercz,et al.  Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: A validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method. , 2017, Forensic science international.

[37]  Vera Weisbecker,et al.  Sharing is caring? Measurement error and the issues arising from combining 3D morphometric datasets , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[38]  Jaroslav Brůžek,et al.  Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. , 2017, American journal of physical anthropology.

[39]  David Errickson,et al.  Towards a Best Practice for the Use of Active Non-contact Surface Scanning to Record Human Skeletal Remains from Archaeological Contexts , 2017 .

[40]  Olivier Delémont,et al.  CT-scan vs. 3D surface scanning of a skull: first considerations regarding reproducibility issues , 2017, Forensic sciences research.

[41]  K. Chaumoitre,et al.  Evaluating the consistency, repeatability, and reproducibility of osteometric data on dry bone surfaces, scanned dry bone surfaces, and scanned bone surfaces obtained from living individuals , 2017, BMSAP.

[42]  Gérald Quatrehomme,et al.  Sex determination using the DSP (probabilistic sex diagnosis) method on the coxal bone: Efficiency of method according to number of available variables. , 2017, Forensic science international.

[43]  M. Spradley.  Metric Methods for the Biological Profile in Forensic Anthropology: Sex, Ancestry, and Stature , 2016, Academic forensic pathology.

[44]  Michala K Stock,et al.  The Utility of Advanced Imaging in Forensic Anthropology , 2016, Academic forensic pathology.

[45]  Tanuj Kanchan,et al.  A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[46]  Frank Siegmund,et al.  Body height estimation from post-mortem CT femoral F1 measurements in a contemporary Swiss population. , 2016, Legal medicine.

[47]  Tim Thompson,et al.  The application of 3D visualization of osteological trauma for the courtroom: A critical review , 2014 .

[48]  Lia Betti,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the os coxae and the effects of microevolutionary processes. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[49]  Gary Hatch,et al.  Sex determination from os sacrum by postmortem CT. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[50]  Jennifer M Vollner,et al.  A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[51]  Susan C. Kuzminsky,et al.  Three-dimensional laser scanning: potential uses for museum conservation and scientific research , 2012 .

[52]  Garyfalia Ampanozi,et al.  Format preferences of district attorneys for post-mortem medical imaging reports: understandability, cost effectiveness, and suitability for the courtroom: a questionnaire based study. , 2012, Legal medicine.

[53]  Summer J Decker,et al.  Virtual Determination of Sex: Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Adult Pelvis from 3D Computed Tomography Models *,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[54]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  Reverse Engineering—Rapid Prototyping of the Skull in Forensic Trauma Analysis , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[55]  M Katherine Spradley,et al.  Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[56]  Ann H Ross,et al.  A Geometric Morphometric Approach to Sex Determination of the Human Adult Os Coxa , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[57]  P. Ruff,et al.  Novel methods of molecular sex identification from skeletal tissue using the amelogenin gene. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[58]  Michael J. Thali,et al.  Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”–a feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[59]  Ursula Buck,et al.  Haptics in forensics: the possibilities and advantages in using the haptic device for reconstruction approaches in forensic science. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[60]  E. Cunha,et al.  DSP: A tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements , 2005 .

[61]  Tim D. White,et al.  The Human Bone Manual , 2005 .

[62]  Nicole M. Scott,et al.  Intraobserver error associated with measurements of the hand , 2005, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[63]  T. Rogers,et al.  Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[64]  P. Dijkstra,et al.  Test–Retest Reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in Healthy Adults , 2004, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[65]  Jaroslav Bruzek,et al.  A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[66]  P. Walker.  A BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE HISTORY OF VIOLENCE , 2001 .

[67]  M. Stoneking,et al.  Sex determination of ancient human skeletons using DNA. , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[68]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[69]  G. Acsadi,et al.  History of Human Life Span and Mortality , 1971 .

[70]  T W Phenice,et al.  A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[71]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[72]  W. M. Krogman.  The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[73]  S. Washburn,et al.  Tools and human evolution. , 1960, Scientific American.

[74]  C. Vansickle,et al.  Applications of sex estimation in paleoanthropology, bioarchaeology, and forensic anthropology , 2020 .

[75]  A. Klales.  Introduction to sex estimation and this volume , 2020 .

[76]  S. Blau,et al.  The application of medical imaging to the anthropological estimation of sex , 2020 .

[77]  H. Garvin,et al.  The confusion between biological sex and gender and potential implications of misinterpretations , 2020 .

[78]  A. Klales.  Sex estimation using pelvis morphology , 2020 .

[79]  Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton , 2020 .

[80]  M. Pavlicev,et al.  Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: New explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[81]  R. Crompton,et al.  The endocast of StW 573 ("Little Foot") and hominin brain evolution. , 2019, Journal of human evolution.

[82]  Victor Sholukha,et al.  Sex determination using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[83]  Thomas Siek,et al.  An Exploration of Tactile Interaction in Osteology and Material Culture , 2014 .

[84]  M. Friess,et al.  Scratching the Surface? The use of surface scanning in physical and paleoanthropology. , 2012, Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS.

[85]  M. Steyn,et al.  Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[86]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains , 1994 .

[87]  M. Işcan,et al.  Determination of Sex from the Sacroiliac Joint: a Visual Assessment Technique , 1984 .

[88]  D. Ferembach,et al.  Recommendation for Age and Sex Diagnoses of Skeletons , 1980 .

[89]  M. Kelley.  Sex determination with fragmented skeletal remains. , 1979, Journal of forensic sciences.