Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower

Abstract Cultural heritage protection is a key issue around the world today. In this paper, the contingent valuation method has been applied to obtain the social benefits that stem from the restoration of an old Arab tower in the Valencia Region of Spain. Due to a current and past lack of protection, the remains of this historic monument are few. Therefore, 252 individuals were randomly interviewed. On conducting our study we distinguished between low, average, and high consumers of cultural goods. Our main finding is that the mean willingness to pay (WTP) is considerably higher for the second group. To give further credence to this observation both parametric and non-parametric approaches were employed and these yielded similar results. Finally, two equations were estimated in order to ratify the results obtained from a theoretical point of view.

[1]  W. Hanemann,et al.  Valuation and management of tropical forests , 1996, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[2]  Salvador del Saz-Salazar,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Environmental Improvements in a Large City Evidence from The Spike Model and From a Non-Parametric Approach , 2001 .

[3]  Spencer Henson,et al.  CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REDUCTIONS IN THE RISK OF FOOD POISONING IN THE UK , 1996 .

[4]  Paul R. Portney,et al.  The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care , 1994 .

[5]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  Current Issues in Environmental Economics , 1995 .

[6]  D. Maddison,et al.  Valuing the Benefits of Cleaning Lincoln Cathedral , 2001 .

[7]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[8]  Klaus F. Zimmermann,et al.  Pseudo‐R 2’s in the ordinal probit model* , 1992 .

[9]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[10]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods , 1998 .

[11]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Further Investigation of Voluntary Contribution Contingent Valuation: Fair Share, Time of Contribution, and Respondent Uncertainty , 2002 .

[12]  A. Dragun,et al.  The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method , 2001 .

[13]  Mark C. Berger,et al.  Valuing the Arts: A Contingent Valuation Approach , 2002 .

[14]  A. Randall.  The NOAA Panel Report: A New Beginning or the End of an Era? , 1997 .

[15]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality , 1991 .

[16]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. , 1990 .

[17]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[18]  L. Hitchens.  Ståle Navrud and Richard C. Ready (eds.): 2002, Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts , 2003 .

[19]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Valuation of tropical rainforests: philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation , 1998 .

[20]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  Obtaining welfare bounds in discrete-response valuation studies : A non-parametric approach , 1999 .

[21]  Jordi Lopez Sintas,et al.  The Consumption of Cultural Products: An Analysis of the Spanish Social Space , 2002 .

[22]  R. Ready,et al.  Why Value Cultural Heritage , 2002 .

[23]  S. Yoo,et al.  Measuring the Economic Benefits of the Ozone Pollution Control Policy in Seoul: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey , 2001 .

[24]  R. Carson.  Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide† , 1999 .

[25]  B. Kriström.  Valuing environmental benefits using the contingent valuation method - an econometric analysis , 1990 .

[26]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Evaluating the multiple benefits of marine water quality improvements: how important are health risk reductions? , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[28]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Information Bias in Contingent Valuation: Effects of Personal Relevance, Quality of Information, and Motivational Orientation , 1996 .

[29]  B. Kriström.  Practical Problems in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[30]  Walter Santagata,et al.  Contingent Valuation of a Cultural Public Good and Policy Design: The Case of ``Napoli Musei Aperti'' , 2000 .

[31]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[32]  Analysing Conflict between Cultural Heritage and Nature Conservation in the Australian Alps: A CVM Approach , 1996 .

[33]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[34]  D. Mercer,et al.  Valuing a Global Environmental Good: U.S. Residents' Willingness to Pay to Protect Tropical Rain Forests , 1997 .

[35]  Jeffrey Englin,et al.  Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods , 1997 .

[36]  Ståle Navrud,et al.  Valuing Cultural Heritage , 2002 .

[37]  H. D. Brunk,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION FOR SAMPLING WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION , 1955 .

[38]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  On Designing Constructed Markets in Valuation Surveys , 2002 .