论文信息 - Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)

Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)

Abstract 1. Introduction Hamm, Kamp, and van Lambalgen 2006 (hereafter HKL) propose to relate NL discourse to cognitive representations that also deal with world knowledge, planning, belief revision, etc. Their implementation involves translating NL discourse first into DRT, which explicates the linguistic information, and then into an event calculus, which uses world knowledge and non-monotonic reasoning to arrive at the final cognitive representation.

Maria Bittner

[1] Barry Richards,et al. On interpreting pronouns , 1984 .

[2] Bonnie L. Webber,et al. Tense as Discourse Anaphor , 1988, CL.

[3] M. A. Jones. Tense, aspect and mood , 1996 .

[4] Mark Steedman,et al. Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference , 1988, CL.

[5] M. Walker,et al. Centering Theory in Discourse , 1998 .

[6] Barbara H. Partes. Nominal and temporal anaphora , 1984 .

[7] Michiel van Lambalgen,et al. There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics , 2006 .

[8] J. M. Peirce. Aspect , 1871, Nature.

[9] H. Kamp,et al. Tense in Texts , 1983 .

[10] S. Roumyana. ASPECTUAL ENTITIES AND TENSE IN DISCOURSE , 2002 .

[11] Maria Bittner,et al. Word Order and Incremental Update , 2003 .

[12] Bernard Comrie,et al. Time in language. , 2000 .

[13] M. Bittner. Online update: Temporal, modal, and de se anaphora in polysynthetic discourse , 2007 .

[14] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[15] Maria Bittner,et al. Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora , 2008 .

[16] Matthew Stone,et al. Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals , 1999 .