A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map

Research highlights? The proposed framework can identify cause and effect relationships among strategic objectives of strategy map through processing of the expertise and knowledge of senior managers. In this process, the integrated structure is introduced for the macro level balanced scorecard. And in addition to the mathematical modeling of cause and effect relationships, a decision support system could be presented that may increase the efficiency of the balanced scorecard management system. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a widely adopted performance management framework first introduced in the early 1990s. More recently, it has been proposed as the basic for a strategic management system. Strategy mapping is the most important task in building a Balanced Scorecard system. Strategy mapping is the process for visually making cause and effect relationships between all possible strategic objectives in an organization. The process for building and constructing a strategy map is a human centric activity which could be considered as the combination and integration of all knowledge and preferences of the managerial boards. From the view point of strategic decision making in an organization, the process for building a strategy map could be viewed in a general body of a unified group decision making context. If we see the strategy map, as a structural modeling framework for making the cause and effect relationships among the strategic objectives, it is possible to deploy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) as a framework for structural modeling approach subject to the problem. The DEMATEL method gathers collective knowledge to capture the causal relationships between strategic criteria. The model is especially practical and useful for visualizing the structure of complicated causal relationships with matrices or digraphs. Generally speaking, because in building any strategy map, the assigned preferences between the objectives are not crisp necessarily, and experts' domain knowledge could be extracted in a fuzzy environment, then the extended fuzzy DEMATEL is proposed to deal with the ambiguities inherent of such the judgments.

[1]  Hsien-Tang Tsai,et al.  Government performance evaluation using a balanced scorecard with a fuzzy linguistic scale , 2010 .

[2]  Panagiotis Chytas,et al.  A Proactive Fuzzy Cognitive Balanced Scorecard , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[3]  Chung Yu,et al.  A STUDY ON INTEGRATED PORT PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF BALANCED SCORECARD , 2003 .

[4]  Paul R. Niven,et al.  Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results , 2002 .

[5]  N. Evans,et al.  Assessing the balanced scorecard as a management tool for hotels , 2005 .

[6]  G. Liang,et al.  Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for shipping company performance evaluation , 2001 .

[7]  Gavin Lawrie,et al.  The development of the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management , 2003 .

[8]  C L Lin,et al.  A FUZZY EXTENSION OF THE DEMATEL METHOD FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING , 2004 .

[9]  Volkmar H. Haase Computer models for strategic business process optimisation , 2000, Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference. EUROMICRO 2000. Informatics: Inventing the Future.

[10]  Joseph Yoon,et al.  The Dynamics of Organisational Performance Development of a Dynamic Balanced Scorecard , 2000, ICSTM.

[11]  Hans-Knud Arndt,et al.  A Procedure to Estimate Relations in a Balanced Scorecard , 2007, GfKl.

[12]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications - Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, March 7-9, 2007 , 2008, GfKl.

[13]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2003 .

[15]  Fernando Bobillo,et al.  A semantic fuzzy expert system for a fuzzy balanced scorecard , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[17]  Dirk Vriens,et al.  Does the balanced scorecard support organizational viability , 2003 .

[18]  D. Kardaras,et al.  Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps to Model and Analyse Business Performance Assessment , 1997 .